C J Mainwaring, C Wong, R J Lush, J G Smith, C R Singer
{"title":"The role of midazolam-induced sedation in bone marrow aspiration/trephine biopsies.","authors":"C J Mainwaring, C Wong, R J Lush, J G Smith, C R Singer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was undertaken in 102 adult patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) midazolam in the setting of bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy (BMAT). Combined local anaesthetic (LA) and sedation was used in 87% of patients and 13% received LA alone. Amnesia occurred in all sedated patients with only 9% experiencing a mild degree of post-procedure pain. This contrasted sharply with the non-sedated group, in whom 85% had intense pain during the biopsy followed by protracted local discomfort in approximately 54%. Drowsiness and some psychomotor impairment were the only notable sedation-related side-effects in approximately 20%. None required assisted ventilation. There was a resounding patient preference for BMAT with sedation. Considering the ease of use, safety and efficacy of i.v. midazolam, the availability of flumazenil as a reversal agent and the undoubted positive effects on quality of life, we would advocate using it in BMAT provided that there were no contraindications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10285,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and laboratory haematology","volume":"18 4","pages":"285-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and laboratory haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study was undertaken in 102 adult patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) midazolam in the setting of bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy (BMAT). Combined local anaesthetic (LA) and sedation was used in 87% of patients and 13% received LA alone. Amnesia occurred in all sedated patients with only 9% experiencing a mild degree of post-procedure pain. This contrasted sharply with the non-sedated group, in whom 85% had intense pain during the biopsy followed by protracted local discomfort in approximately 54%. Drowsiness and some psychomotor impairment were the only notable sedation-related side-effects in approximately 20%. None required assisted ventilation. There was a resounding patient preference for BMAT with sedation. Considering the ease of use, safety and efficacy of i.v. midazolam, the availability of flumazenil as a reversal agent and the undoubted positive effects on quality of life, we would advocate using it in BMAT provided that there were no contraindications.