M P Dow, J M Jones, D A Dumesic, Y Lu, S S Shapiro
{"title":"The successful use of hyperstimulated washed therapeutic donor insemination after standard therapeutic donor insemination has failed.","authors":"M P Dow, J M Jones, D A Dumesic, Y Lu, S S Shapiro","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether an aggressive therapeutic donor insemination regimen (stimulated folliculogenesis and ovulation plus intrauterine insemination) can produce a better fecundability rate than a more traditional insemination regimen (non-stimulated folliculogenesis plus LH-timed intracervical insemination) in women who have failed to become pregnant during an initial series of six traditional insemination cycles.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective comparison of fecundability rates was undertaken between women undergoing the traditional insemination protocol and those who voluntarily switched to ovarian hyperstimulation coupled with intrauterine insemination.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eight-two women who failed to become pregnant during an initial series of six intracervical insemination cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fecundability was 5.6% in cycles of continued urinary LH-timed intracervical insemination and 19.4% when the more aggressive regimen was applied. The difference in fecundability between protocols was significant (P < .005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After an initial series of donor inseminations has failed, a more aggressive insemination regimen involving ovarian hyperstimulation followed by washed intrauterine insemination provides a higher fecundability rate than continued intracervical insemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":79342,"journal":{"name":"International journal of fertility and menopausal studies","volume":"41 6","pages":"516-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of fertility and menopausal studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether an aggressive therapeutic donor insemination regimen (stimulated folliculogenesis and ovulation plus intrauterine insemination) can produce a better fecundability rate than a more traditional insemination regimen (non-stimulated folliculogenesis plus LH-timed intracervical insemination) in women who have failed to become pregnant during an initial series of six traditional insemination cycles.
Design: A retrospective comparison of fecundability rates was undertaken between women undergoing the traditional insemination protocol and those who voluntarily switched to ovarian hyperstimulation coupled with intrauterine insemination.
Participants: Eight-two women who failed to become pregnant during an initial series of six intracervical insemination cycles.
Results: Fecundability was 5.6% in cycles of continued urinary LH-timed intracervical insemination and 19.4% when the more aggressive regimen was applied. The difference in fecundability between protocols was significant (P < .005).
Conclusion: After an initial series of donor inseminations has failed, a more aggressive insemination regimen involving ovarian hyperstimulation followed by washed intrauterine insemination provides a higher fecundability rate than continued intracervical insemination.