Effects of different amounts of LH on superovulation induction with long-acting GnRH in an IVF program.

G Ragni, L De Laurentis, L Perotti, A D Serra, W Vegetti, P G Crosignani
{"title":"Effects of different amounts of LH on superovulation induction with long-acting GnRH in an IVF program.","authors":"G Ragni,&nbsp;L De Laurentis,&nbsp;L Perotti,&nbsp;A D Serra,&nbsp;W Vegetti,&nbsp;P G Crosignani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether different doses of exogenous LH affect IVF outcome.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of two consecutive trials.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Infertility Unit of 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan, Italy.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Two groups of 40 eumennorrheic patients matched for age and indications for in vitro fertilization.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>After suppression with a GnRH analogue, both groups received equal amounts of FSH in the first five days of stimulation; after this, the proportions of LH administered were doubled in one group because a different preparation was in use.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The following observations were compared: number of scans (days to hCG), number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, quality and number of embryos transferred, pregnancy and abortion rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Doubling the amount of LH administered does not affect any outcome measure except the number of days of stimulation needed prior to hCG administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant difference was seen in terms of number of oocytes, embryo number and quality, pregnancy and abortion rate. The only difference was the length of the stimulation phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":79342,"journal":{"name":"International journal of fertility and menopausal studies","volume":"41 5","pages":"466-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of fertility and menopausal studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether different doses of exogenous LH affect IVF outcome.

Design: Retrospective analysis of two consecutive trials.

Setting: Infertility Unit of 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan, Italy.

Patients: Two groups of 40 eumennorrheic patients matched for age and indications for in vitro fertilization.

Intervention: After suppression with a GnRH analogue, both groups received equal amounts of FSH in the first five days of stimulation; after this, the proportions of LH administered were doubled in one group because a different preparation was in use.

Main outcome measures: The following observations were compared: number of scans (days to hCG), number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, quality and number of embryos transferred, pregnancy and abortion rate.

Results: Doubling the amount of LH administered does not affect any outcome measure except the number of days of stimulation needed prior to hCG administration.

Conclusions: No significant difference was seen in terms of number of oocytes, embryo number and quality, pregnancy and abortion rate. The only difference was the length of the stimulation phase.

不同量的黄体生成素对体外受精中长效GnRH诱导超排卵的影响。
目的:评价不同剂量的外源性黄体生成素对体外受精结果的影响。设计:对两个连续试验进行回顾性分析。单位:意大利米兰大学妇产科一科不孕症室。患者:年龄和体外受精适应症相匹配的两组40例肾衰患者。干预:在GnRH类似物抑制后,两组在刺激的前5天接受等量的FSH;在此之后,由于使用不同的制剂,在一组中给药的黄体生成素的比例增加了一倍。主要观察指标:比较以下观察结果:扫描次数(至hCG天数)、取出卵母细胞数量、受精率、移植胚胎质量和数量、妊娠率和流产率。结果:除了在给予hCG之前需要刺激的天数外,LH给药量加倍并不影响任何结果测量。结论:两组在卵母细胞数量、胚胎数量和质量、妊娠率和流产率方面均无显著差异。唯一的区别是刺激阶段的长度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信