C W Maboundou, J Magnette, G Paintaud, J L Dupond, T Fest, A Najman, E Solary, A Xicluna, A Sirito, J Y Cahn
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics of a more reliable Chloraminophene formulation.","authors":"C W Maboundou, J Magnette, G Paintaud, J L Dupond, T Fest, A Najman, E Solary, A Xicluna, A Sirito, J Y Cahn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pharmacokinetics of two formulations of chlorambucil, Chloraminophene capsules and Chloraminophene tablets, were compared in 12 patients in a randomized cross-over study. Chlorambucil concentrations in plasma were measured by HPLC over a period of 24 h after drug intake. The peak concentration (Cmax) occurred earlier after administration of capsules than after administration of tablets [median (range)]: 0.50 (0.33-0.66) h vs 2.00 (0.66-4.00) h (p < 0.01). Although values of Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) were not significantly different, the two formulations were not bioequivalent. Tolerance was in both cases acceptable, with only a transient decrease in haemoglobin one day after last drug intake. The variability of chlorambucil pharmacokinetics tended to be less important for capsules than for tablets: 38% vs 71% and 35% vs 113% for Cmax and AUC respectively. Capsules are therefore likely to be more reliable than tablets for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19366,"journal":{"name":"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie","volume":"37 6","pages":"297-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics of two formulations of chlorambucil, Chloraminophene capsules and Chloraminophene tablets, were compared in 12 patients in a randomized cross-over study. Chlorambucil concentrations in plasma were measured by HPLC over a period of 24 h after drug intake. The peak concentration (Cmax) occurred earlier after administration of capsules than after administration of tablets [median (range)]: 0.50 (0.33-0.66) h vs 2.00 (0.66-4.00) h (p < 0.01). Although values of Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) were not significantly different, the two formulations were not bioequivalent. Tolerance was in both cases acceptable, with only a transient decrease in haemoglobin one day after last drug intake. The variability of chlorambucil pharmacokinetics tended to be less important for capsules than for tablets: 38% vs 71% and 35% vs 113% for Cmax and AUC respectively. Capsules are therefore likely to be more reliable than tablets for clinical use.
在一项随机交叉研究中,比较了氯氨酚胶囊和氯氨酚片剂两种剂型在12例患者中的药代动力学。服药后24 h,用高效液相色谱法测定血浆中氯霉素浓度。给药后Cmax出现的时间较给药后早[中位数(范围)]:0.50 (0.33-0.66)h vs 2.00 (0.66-4.00) h (p < 0.01)。虽然Cmax值和血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)无显著差异,但两制剂不具有生物等效性。两例患者的耐受性均可接受,仅在最后一次服药后一天血红蛋白短暂下降。氯霉素药动学的变异性对胶囊的影响小于片剂:Cmax和AUC分别为38%对71%和35%对113%。因此,在临床使用中,胶囊可能比片剂更可靠。