[Underreporting of maternal mortality in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: comparison of 2 information systems].

L K Silva, F B Russomano
{"title":"[Underreporting of maternal mortality in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: comparison of 2 information systems].","authors":"L K Silva,&nbsp;F B Russomano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two notification systems were compared to estimate maternal death underreporting for 1988 in eight public maternity clinics of Rio de Janeiro. The death rates obtained were compared with the corrected maternal death rate (13.9 per 10,000 live births), which represented all deaths validated by either system. The system based on hospital discharge records yielded a maternal death-rate of 11.6 per 10,000 live births, or 16% underreporting when compared with the corrected death rate. Error was due to system failure in processing the discharge forms, and also to the transfer of patients to nonmonitored hospitals. The system based on death certificates, including \"presumed\" maternal deaths, presented a rate of 6.6 per 10,000 live births, with 52% underreporting in relation to the corrected rate. The official death rate, based on maternal deaths as declared in death certificates, underreported by 60% compared to the corrected death rate. When the two systems were compared with each other, the one based on death certificates showed 62% underreporting in relation to that based on hospital discharge forms. In order to minimize underreporting of maternal deaths and to broaden the knowledge on circumstances relating to those deaths, it is suggested (a) that a perinatal information system be introduced in all obstetric service units, and (b) to monitor the final outcome of patients transferred to tertiary units.</p>","PeriodicalId":75611,"journal":{"name":"Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau","volume":"120 1","pages":"36-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two notification systems were compared to estimate maternal death underreporting for 1988 in eight public maternity clinics of Rio de Janeiro. The death rates obtained were compared with the corrected maternal death rate (13.9 per 10,000 live births), which represented all deaths validated by either system. The system based on hospital discharge records yielded a maternal death-rate of 11.6 per 10,000 live births, or 16% underreporting when compared with the corrected death rate. Error was due to system failure in processing the discharge forms, and also to the transfer of patients to nonmonitored hospitals. The system based on death certificates, including "presumed" maternal deaths, presented a rate of 6.6 per 10,000 live births, with 52% underreporting in relation to the corrected rate. The official death rate, based on maternal deaths as declared in death certificates, underreported by 60% compared to the corrected death rate. When the two systems were compared with each other, the one based on death certificates showed 62% underreporting in relation to that based on hospital discharge forms. In order to minimize underreporting of maternal deaths and to broaden the knowledge on circumstances relating to those deaths, it is suggested (a) that a perinatal information system be introduced in all obstetric service units, and (b) to monitor the final outcome of patients transferred to tertiary units.

[巴西里约热内卢产妇死亡率低报:两种信息系统的比较]。
比较了里约热内卢8个公立妇产诊所1988年两种通报系统的估计产妇死亡漏报情况。将获得的死亡率与校正后的产妇死亡率(每10 000例活产13.9例)进行比较,校正后的产妇死亡率代表经任一系统验证的所有死亡。基于出院记录的系统得出的产妇死亡率为每1万例活产11.6例,与校正后的死亡率相比,少报了16%。错误是由于处理出院表格的系统故障,以及将患者转移到不受监控的医院。基于死亡证明(包括“推定”的孕产妇死亡)的系统显示,每10 000名活产婴儿中有6.6人死亡,与正确的比率相比,少报了52%。根据死亡证明上公布的产妇死亡人数计算的官方死亡率与校正后的死亡率相比少报了60%。当两种系统相互比较时,基于死亡证明的系统比基于出院表的系统少报62%。为了尽量减少少报产妇死亡和扩大对与这些死亡有关的情况的了解,建议(a)在所有产科服务单位采用围产期信息系统,以及(b)监测转到第三级单位的病人的最终结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信