[Psychotherapy in children and youths].

Acta psychiatrica Belgica Pub Date : 1996-05-01
N Van Broeck
{"title":"[Psychotherapy in children and youths].","authors":"N Van Broeck","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Child and adolescent psychotherapy form a large proportion of the total amount of psychotherapeutic efforts. Because of the age of the patients, the positive or negative impact is considerable. From the literature we learn that the efforts made to evaluate psychotherapy effects are not in balance with the amount of executed therapies. Meta-analyses of the available controlled therapy-evaluation studies offer a limited but rather encouraging view on the effectiveness of child and adolescent psychotherapy. Also on the differences in effectiveness according to the therapeutic orientation or the treated disturbance some interesting conclusions can be drawn. Unfortunately, these conclusions are based on a limited number of studies, because few clinicians conduct systematic research on therapy effectiveness. Systematic therapy evaluation requires some explicit decisions. The clinician has to decide on the description of the disturbance and the use of a diagnostic system, on the choice of standardized assessment procedures, on the operationalization of his therapeutic techniques and on the availability of norm groups and/or appropriate control conditions. In our psychology and psychotherapy training programs, attention for therapy evaluation is rather limited. Only a small number of students or trainees is explicitly trained in this aspect of therapeutic work. The available literature offers some interesting suggestions to enhance the quantity and the quality of the research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":75415,"journal":{"name":"Acta psychiatrica Belgica","volume":"96 3-4","pages":"171-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta psychiatrica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Child and adolescent psychotherapy form a large proportion of the total amount of psychotherapeutic efforts. Because of the age of the patients, the positive or negative impact is considerable. From the literature we learn that the efforts made to evaluate psychotherapy effects are not in balance with the amount of executed therapies. Meta-analyses of the available controlled therapy-evaluation studies offer a limited but rather encouraging view on the effectiveness of child and adolescent psychotherapy. Also on the differences in effectiveness according to the therapeutic orientation or the treated disturbance some interesting conclusions can be drawn. Unfortunately, these conclusions are based on a limited number of studies, because few clinicians conduct systematic research on therapy effectiveness. Systematic therapy evaluation requires some explicit decisions. The clinician has to decide on the description of the disturbance and the use of a diagnostic system, on the choice of standardized assessment procedures, on the operationalization of his therapeutic techniques and on the availability of norm groups and/or appropriate control conditions. In our psychology and psychotherapy training programs, attention for therapy evaluation is rather limited. Only a small number of students or trainees is explicitly trained in this aspect of therapeutic work. The available literature offers some interesting suggestions to enhance the quantity and the quality of the research in this area.

[儿童和青少年的心理治疗]。
儿童和青少年心理治疗在心理治疗工作的总量中占很大比例。由于患者的年龄,正面或负面的影响是相当大的。从文献中我们了解到,评估心理治疗效果的努力与执行治疗的数量并不平衡。对现有对照治疗评估研究的荟萃分析提供了关于儿童和青少年心理治疗有效性的有限但相当鼓舞人心的观点。此外,根据治疗取向或治疗障碍的不同,可以得出一些有趣的结论。不幸的是,这些结论是基于有限的研究,因为很少有临床医生对治疗效果进行系统的研究。系统的治疗评估需要一些明确的决定。临床医生必须决定对障碍的描述和诊断系统的使用,选择标准化的评估程序,他的治疗技术的操作化,以及标准组和/或适当的控制条件的可用性。在我们的心理学和心理治疗培训项目中,对治疗评估的关注相当有限。只有一小部分学生或受训者在这方面接受过明确的治疗工作培训。现有的文献提供了一些有趣的建议,以提高这一领域的研究数量和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信