Activity of intrinsic laryngeal muscles in fluent and disfluent speech.

A Smith, M Denny, L A Shaffer, E M Kelly, M Hirano
{"title":"Activity of intrinsic laryngeal muscles in fluent and disfluent speech.","authors":"A Smith,&nbsp;M Denny,&nbsp;L A Shaffer,&nbsp;E M Kelly,&nbsp;M Hirano","doi":"10.1044/jshr.3902.329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of the present experiment was to determine if stuttering is associated with unusually high levels of activity in laryngeal muscles. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of thyroarytenoid and cricothyroid recordings from 4 stuttering and 3 nonstuttering adults revealed the following: Compared to periods of fluent speech, intervals of disfluent speech are not typically characterized by higher levels of activity in these muscles; and when EMG levels during conversational speech are compared to maximal activation levels for these muscles (e.g., those observed during singing and the Valsalva maneuver), normally fluent adults show robust and sometimes near maximal recruitment during conversational speech. The adults who stutter had a lower operating range for these muscles during conversational speech, and their disfluencies did not produce relatively high activation levels. In summary, the present data require us to reject the claim that adults with a history of chronic stuttering routinely produce excessive levels of intrinsic laryngeal muscle activity. These results suggest that the use of botulinum toxin injections into the vocal folds to treat stuttering should be questioned.</p>","PeriodicalId":76022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech and hearing research","volume":"39 2","pages":"329-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1044/jshr.3902.329","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech and hearing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3902.329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

The goal of the present experiment was to determine if stuttering is associated with unusually high levels of activity in laryngeal muscles. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of thyroarytenoid and cricothyroid recordings from 4 stuttering and 3 nonstuttering adults revealed the following: Compared to periods of fluent speech, intervals of disfluent speech are not typically characterized by higher levels of activity in these muscles; and when EMG levels during conversational speech are compared to maximal activation levels for these muscles (e.g., those observed during singing and the Valsalva maneuver), normally fluent adults show robust and sometimes near maximal recruitment during conversational speech. The adults who stutter had a lower operating range for these muscles during conversational speech, and their disfluencies did not produce relatively high activation levels. In summary, the present data require us to reject the claim that adults with a history of chronic stuttering routinely produce excessive levels of intrinsic laryngeal muscle activity. These results suggest that the use of botulinum toxin injections into the vocal folds to treat stuttering should be questioned.

流利和不流利言语中喉内肌的活动。
本实验的目的是确定口吃是否与喉部肌肉异常高水平的活动有关。对4名口吃和3名非口吃成人的类甲状腺肌和环甲肌的定性和定量分析显示:与语言流利期相比,语言不流利期这些肌肉的活动水平并不高;当将会话演讲期间的肌电图水平与这些肌肉的最大激活水平(例如,唱歌和Valsalva动作时观察到的肌肉)进行比较时,通常流利的成年人在会话演讲期间表现出强劲的,有时接近最大的恢复。口吃的成年人在谈话时,这些肌肉的活动范围较低,他们的不流利并没有产生相对较高的激活水平。总之,目前的数据要求我们拒绝有慢性口吃史的成年人通常会产生过高水平的喉部固有肌活动的说法。这些结果表明,使用肉毒杆菌毒素注射声带治疗口吃应该受到质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信