[Usefulness of delta-aminolevulinic acid in blood as an indicator of lead exposure].

Y Morita, T Sakai, S Araki, T Araki, Y Masuyama
{"title":"[Usefulness of delta-aminolevulinic acid in blood as an indicator of lead exposure].","authors":"Y Morita,&nbsp;T Sakai,&nbsp;S Araki,&nbsp;T Araki,&nbsp;Y Masuyama","doi":"10.1539/joh1959.35.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concentration of delta-aminolevulinic acid in blood (ALA-B) was determined using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). To improve the chromatographic separation and the recovery rate of ALA determination in blood, acetate buffer was used in the reaction mixture of fluorescence derivatization. The detection limit of ALA-B was ca. 2 micrograms/l at signal to noise ratio of 5, and the analytical recovery was 102.0 +/- 4.10% (mean +/- SD), when 50 micrograms/l of ALA was added to 7 blood samples (ALA-B levels: 6.5-103.0 micrograms/l). ALA-B levels in control subjects (n = 19) were 5.3 +/- 1.4 micrograms/l (mean +/- SD) and those in 52 lead workers (blood lead levels (Pb-B): 2.4-86.2 micrograms/dl) were 15.4 +/- 12.2 micrograms/l (range: 3.1-137.3 micrograms/l). Standard curve of ALA was linear over a wide range, at least up to 400 micrograms/l. In the workers, the correlation coefficients of ALA-B vs. Pb-B and ALA-B vs. delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase activity (ALA-D) were higher than those of urinary concentration of ALA vs. Pb-B and that vs. ALA-D, especially in the moderate Pb-B level (less than 40 micrograms/dl, n = 35). Unless the urinary concentrations of ALA were not corrected, significant correlation could not be found between Pb-B and urinary ALA in the workers moderately exposed to lead, and the correlation coefficient between urinary ALA and ALA-D was -0.354, while the correlation coefficients of ALA-B vs. Pb-B and ALA-B vs. ALA-D were 0.739 and -0.746, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":21500,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo igaku. Japanese journal of industrial health","volume":"35 2","pages":"112-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1539/joh1959.35.112","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo igaku. Japanese journal of industrial health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/joh1959.35.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The concentration of delta-aminolevulinic acid in blood (ALA-B) was determined using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). To improve the chromatographic separation and the recovery rate of ALA determination in blood, acetate buffer was used in the reaction mixture of fluorescence derivatization. The detection limit of ALA-B was ca. 2 micrograms/l at signal to noise ratio of 5, and the analytical recovery was 102.0 +/- 4.10% (mean +/- SD), when 50 micrograms/l of ALA was added to 7 blood samples (ALA-B levels: 6.5-103.0 micrograms/l). ALA-B levels in control subjects (n = 19) were 5.3 +/- 1.4 micrograms/l (mean +/- SD) and those in 52 lead workers (blood lead levels (Pb-B): 2.4-86.2 micrograms/dl) were 15.4 +/- 12.2 micrograms/l (range: 3.1-137.3 micrograms/l). Standard curve of ALA was linear over a wide range, at least up to 400 micrograms/l. In the workers, the correlation coefficients of ALA-B vs. Pb-B and ALA-B vs. delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase activity (ALA-D) were higher than those of urinary concentration of ALA vs. Pb-B and that vs. ALA-D, especially in the moderate Pb-B level (less than 40 micrograms/dl, n = 35). Unless the urinary concentrations of ALA were not corrected, significant correlation could not be found between Pb-B and urinary ALA in the workers moderately exposed to lead, and the correlation coefficient between urinary ALA and ALA-D was -0.354, while the correlation coefficients of ALA-B vs. Pb-B and ALA-B vs. ALA-D were 0.739 and -0.746, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[血中δ氨基乙酰丙酸作为铅暴露指标的作用]。
采用高效液相色谱法测定血中α -氨基乙酰丙酸(ALA-B)的浓度。为了提高血液中ALA测定的色谱分离和回收率,在荧光衍生化反应混合物中使用醋酸酯缓冲液。7份血样(ALA- b水平为6.5 ~ 103.0微克/l)中添加50微克/l的ALA,在信噪比为5时,ALA- b的检出限约为2微克/l,回收率为102.0 +/- 4.10%(平均+/- SD)。对照组(19例)的ALA-B水平为5.3 +/- 1.4微克/升(平均+/- SD), 52例铅工(血铅水平(pb): 2.4-86.2微克/升)的ALA-B水平为15.4 +/- 12.2微克/升(范围:3.1-137.3微克/升)。ALA的标准曲线在较宽的范围内呈线性,至少在400微克/l以内。在工人中,ALA- b与Pb-B和ALA- b与δ氨基乙酰丙酸脱水酶活性(ALA- d)的相关系数高于ALA与Pb-B和ALA- d浓度的相关系数,特别是在中等pb水平(小于40微克/分升,n = 35)。除非不校正尿中ALA浓度,否则中等铅暴露工人尿中Pb-B与ALA之间没有显著相关性,尿中ALA与ALA- d的相关系数为-0.354,而ALA- b与Pb-B、ALA- b与ALA- d的相关系数分别为0.739和-0.746。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信