Midazolam and flunitrazepam: pharmacokinetics and effects on night time respiration and body movements in the elderly.

M Seppälä, J Alihanka, J J Himberg, J Kanto, T Rajala, L Sourander
{"title":"Midazolam and flunitrazepam: pharmacokinetics and effects on night time respiration and body movements in the elderly.","authors":"M Seppälä,&nbsp;J Alihanka,&nbsp;J J Himberg,&nbsp;J Kanto,&nbsp;T Rajala,&nbsp;L Sourander","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a double-blind crossover study, the pharmacokinetics and effects on night-time respiration and body movements of midazolam 7.5 mg, flunitrazepam 1 mg, and placebo were studied in 5 elderly insomniac patients with the static charge sensitive bed-method (SCSB). In a supine position, the gastrointestinal absorption rate of flunitrazepam (tmax 0.6 h) was faster than that of midazolam (tmax 0.95 h). The elimination phase half-life of midazolam was about twice as long as reported earlier in healthy adult volunteers, but ageing did not affect the elimination of flunitrazepam. The shape of the serum concentration-time curve of both benzodiazepine derivatives was quite similar. The sleep of these five insomniacs became more peaceful and the respiration more regular during midazolam and flunitrazepam, compared with placebo. Both benzodiazepines significantly decreased body movements and the cumulative movement time remained shorter throughout the night, compared with placebo. Total variability (VI) was clearly decreased with flurazepam, and a similar but not statistically significant tendency was seen with midazolam, compared with placebo. Accordingly, the proportion of quiet sleep (QS) increased (p = 0.014) and the proportion of active sleep (AS) decreased (p = 0.019) with both benzodiazepines, compared with placebo. This reflects the changed control of respiration by higher brain structures. No signs of increased respiratory resistance (i.e. ballistocardiographic respiratory amplitude variation BRV < 60%) were seen with either of the drugs or placebo. There were no differences in the subjects' own estimation of their sleep during medication with these drugs. Only the sleep onset latency was shorter with flunitrazepam compared with midazolam and placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":13817,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","volume":"31 4","pages":"170-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a double-blind crossover study, the pharmacokinetics and effects on night-time respiration and body movements of midazolam 7.5 mg, flunitrazepam 1 mg, and placebo were studied in 5 elderly insomniac patients with the static charge sensitive bed-method (SCSB). In a supine position, the gastrointestinal absorption rate of flunitrazepam (tmax 0.6 h) was faster than that of midazolam (tmax 0.95 h). The elimination phase half-life of midazolam was about twice as long as reported earlier in healthy adult volunteers, but ageing did not affect the elimination of flunitrazepam. The shape of the serum concentration-time curve of both benzodiazepine derivatives was quite similar. The sleep of these five insomniacs became more peaceful and the respiration more regular during midazolam and flunitrazepam, compared with placebo. Both benzodiazepines significantly decreased body movements and the cumulative movement time remained shorter throughout the night, compared with placebo. Total variability (VI) was clearly decreased with flurazepam, and a similar but not statistically significant tendency was seen with midazolam, compared with placebo. Accordingly, the proportion of quiet sleep (QS) increased (p = 0.014) and the proportion of active sleep (AS) decreased (p = 0.019) with both benzodiazepines, compared with placebo. This reflects the changed control of respiration by higher brain structures. No signs of increased respiratory resistance (i.e. ballistocardiographic respiratory amplitude variation BRV < 60%) were seen with either of the drugs or placebo. There were no differences in the subjects' own estimation of their sleep during medication with these drugs. Only the sleep onset latency was shorter with flunitrazepam compared with midazolam and placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

咪达唑仑和氟硝西泮:药代动力学及对老年人夜间呼吸和身体运动的影响。
采用双盲交叉试验,采用静电电荷敏感床法(SCSB)研究了5例老年失眠症患者咪达唑仑7.5 mg、氟硝西泮1 mg和安慰剂的药代动力学及对夜间呼吸和肢体运动的影响。平卧位时氟硝西泮胃肠道吸收速率(tmax 0.6 h)快于咪达唑仑(tmax 0.95 h),健康成年志愿者咪达唑仑的消除期半衰期约为前期报道的两倍,但年龄不影响氟硝西泮的消除。两种苯二氮卓类药物的血清浓度-时间曲线形状非常相似。与安慰剂相比,服用咪达唑仑和氟硝西泮后,这5名失眠症患者的睡眠变得更加平静,呼吸也更加规律。与安慰剂相比,两种苯二氮卓类药物都显著减少了身体运动,并且整个晚上的累计运动时间都更短。氟西泮明显降低了总变异性(VI),与安慰剂相比,咪达唑仑也有类似但无统计学意义的趋势。因此,与安慰剂相比,两种苯二氮卓类药物组的安静睡眠(QS)比例增加(p = 0.014),活跃睡眠(AS)比例减少(p = 0.019)。这反映了大脑高层结构对呼吸控制的改变。两种药物或安慰剂均未见呼吸阻力增加的迹象(即ballo - cardiography呼吸幅度变化BRV < 60%)。在服用这些药物期间,受试者对自己睡眠的估计没有差异。与咪达唑仑和安慰剂相比,氟硝西泮的睡眠发作潜伏期较短。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信