Comparison of intranasal versus intravenous verapamil bioavailability.

Abstract

Intranasal verapamil administration may limit intrasubject variability encountered due to the metabolism differences of the d and l-isomers. We simultaneously measured verapamil/norverapamil concentrations, PR interval, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in six healthy volunteers receiving verapamil 5 mg intranasally and intravenously on two separate occasions. Two subjects achieved measurable verapamil concentrations after intranasal administration with a mean bioavailability of 16.1%. Intranasal bioavailability was limited secondary to instillation volume. No relationship between HR, MAP and verapamil concentration was noted. A relationship between mean intravenous verapamil concentration and mean PR interval was observed; however, extensive interpatient variability existed: two subjects demonstrated enough counterclockwise hysteresis to skew mean data. Mean data may falsely represent the verapamil concentration-effect relationship. Intranasal verapamil administration is limited by instillation volume. Development of a concentrated dosage form is necessary to assess bioavailability. Concentration-effect relationships are more accurately described using individual, rather than mean data.