The value of early treatment of deer tick bites for the prevention of Lyme disease.

F Agre, R Schwartz
{"title":"The value of early treatment of deer tick bites for the prevention of Lyme disease.","authors":"F Agre,&nbsp;R Schwartz","doi":"10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160330035013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if the early antibiotic treatment of deer tick bites prevented Lyme disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, antibiotic treatment.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private practice in an area endemic for Lyme disease.</p><p><strong>Study participants: </strong>Patients between 3 and 19 years of age who received antibiotic treatment within 3 days following a deer tick bite.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients received an antibiotic or placebo and were followed up for stage I and II disease. All patients had blood drawn at the time of presentation and 6 weeks later for immunofluorescent antibodies (IFA).</p><p><strong>Measurements/main results: </strong>One patient in the placebo group developed clinical Lyme disease associated with an IFA titer of 1:32, considered weakly positive. Three other patients in the placebo group developed an IFA titer of 1:32; one had an influenzalike illness and two had no symptoms. None of the study patients developed any neurologic, cardiac, or arthritic symptoms in the 1- to 3-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the low frequency of illness, the absence of stage II disease, and the inability to establish the efficacy of early antibiotic treatment, we suggest that physicians not routinely use prophylactic antibiotics for deer tick bites.</p>","PeriodicalId":75474,"journal":{"name":"American journal of diseases of children (1960)","volume":"147 9","pages":"945-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160330035013","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of diseases of children (1960)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160330035013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

Objective: To determine if the early antibiotic treatment of deer tick bites prevented Lyme disease.

Design: Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, antibiotic treatment.

Setting: Private practice in an area endemic for Lyme disease.

Study participants: Patients between 3 and 19 years of age who received antibiotic treatment within 3 days following a deer tick bite.

Interventions: Patients received an antibiotic or placebo and were followed up for stage I and II disease. All patients had blood drawn at the time of presentation and 6 weeks later for immunofluorescent antibodies (IFA).

Measurements/main results: One patient in the placebo group developed clinical Lyme disease associated with an IFA titer of 1:32, considered weakly positive. Three other patients in the placebo group developed an IFA titer of 1:32; one had an influenzalike illness and two had no symptoms. None of the study patients developed any neurologic, cardiac, or arthritic symptoms in the 1- to 3-year follow-up.

Conclusion: Based on the low frequency of illness, the absence of stage II disease, and the inability to establish the efficacy of early antibiotic treatment, we suggest that physicians not routinely use prophylactic antibiotics for deer tick bites.

早期治疗鹿蜱叮咬对预防莱姆病的价值。
目的:探讨鹿蜱叮咬早期抗生素治疗是否能预防莱姆病。设计:前瞻性,双盲,安慰剂对照,抗生素治疗。环境:莱姆病流行地区的私人诊所。研究参与者:3至19岁的患者,在鹿蜱叮咬后3天内接受抗生素治疗。干预措施:患者接受抗生素或安慰剂治疗,并随访I期和II期疾病。所有患者均在就诊时和6周后抽血检测免疫荧光抗体(IFA)。测量/主要结果:安慰剂组中有1例患者出现临床莱姆病,其IFA滴度为1:32,被认为是弱阳性。另外三名安慰剂组患者的IFA滴度为1:32;其中一人患有类似流感的疾病,另外两人没有任何症状。在1到3年的随访中,没有研究患者出现任何神经系统、心脏或关节炎症状。结论:基于发病频率低,无II期疾病,无法确定早期抗生素治疗的疗效,我们建议医生不要常规使用预防性抗生素治疗鹿蜱叮咬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信