[Loco-regional thrombolysis in deep venous thrombosis].

IF 0.3 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Phlebologie Pub Date : 1993-04-01
D Palombo, C Porta, P Brustia, F Peinetti, M Udini, A Antico, M Maione, T Meloni, P Carbonato
{"title":"[Loco-regional thrombolysis in deep venous thrombosis].","authors":"D Palombo,&nbsp;C Porta,&nbsp;P Brustia,&nbsp;F Peinetti,&nbsp;M Udini,&nbsp;A Antico,&nbsp;M Maione,&nbsp;T Meloni,&nbsp;P Carbonato","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anticoagulation, by means of heparin and warfarin is, till now, the most common treatment in deep venous thrombosis. Although thrombolytic agents have been available for over 10 years, their use remains quite low, ranging from 15 to 20% of deep venous thromboses. This is due to the relatively high incidence of contraindications as well as to the fact that the potential advantages versus heparin are diminished by the increased bleeding risk and by the potential risk of pulmonary embolism (migration of partially lysed thrombi). Following the example of the \"triple armed therapy\" proposed by Rosenthal for the treatment of pulmonary embolism, we will evaluate if loco-regional thrombolysis, with the catheter wedged against the thrombus, associated with a temporary vena cava interruption by means of an intraluminal filter, can achieve a better lysis of the thrombus without pulmonary embolism. In our Unit 18 patients affected by proximal deep venous thrombosis were submitted to thrombolytic therapy, 6 to systemic treatment, 3 to local treatment and the last 9 to loco-regional thrombolysis, using recombinant tissue-type Plasminogen Activator. We obtained 10 complete lyses, 1 with systemic and 9 with loco-regional treatment. There were no major complications. Thus, we think that venous loco-regional thrombolysis with rt-PA at lower doses, associated with temporary caval interruption, can probably achieve a better lysis than systemic treatment without risk of pulmonary embolism and with a very low haemorrhagic risk, as in arterial loco-regional thrombolysis. Furthermore, loco-regional thrombolysis, by means of a faster thrombus dissolution, could better prevent post-phlebitic syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":49701,"journal":{"name":"Phlebologie","volume":"46 2","pages":"293-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"1993-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anticoagulation, by means of heparin and warfarin is, till now, the most common treatment in deep venous thrombosis. Although thrombolytic agents have been available for over 10 years, their use remains quite low, ranging from 15 to 20% of deep venous thromboses. This is due to the relatively high incidence of contraindications as well as to the fact that the potential advantages versus heparin are diminished by the increased bleeding risk and by the potential risk of pulmonary embolism (migration of partially lysed thrombi). Following the example of the "triple armed therapy" proposed by Rosenthal for the treatment of pulmonary embolism, we will evaluate if loco-regional thrombolysis, with the catheter wedged against the thrombus, associated with a temporary vena cava interruption by means of an intraluminal filter, can achieve a better lysis of the thrombus without pulmonary embolism. In our Unit 18 patients affected by proximal deep venous thrombosis were submitted to thrombolytic therapy, 6 to systemic treatment, 3 to local treatment and the last 9 to loco-regional thrombolysis, using recombinant tissue-type Plasminogen Activator. We obtained 10 complete lyses, 1 with systemic and 9 with loco-regional treatment. There were no major complications. Thus, we think that venous loco-regional thrombolysis with rt-PA at lower doses, associated with temporary caval interruption, can probably achieve a better lysis than systemic treatment without risk of pulmonary embolism and with a very low haemorrhagic risk, as in arterial loco-regional thrombolysis. Furthermore, loco-regional thrombolysis, by means of a faster thrombus dissolution, could better prevent post-phlebitic syndrome.

[深静脉血栓的局部溶栓]。
肝素和华法林抗凝治疗是目前深静脉血栓最常用的治疗方法。虽然溶栓剂的使用已有10多年,但其使用率仍然很低,在深静脉血栓形成中仅占15%至20%。这是由于禁忌症的发生率相对较高,以及由于出血风险增加和肺栓塞(部分溶解血栓的迁移)的潜在风险,与肝素相比的潜在优势被削弱。以Rosenthal提出的治疗肺栓塞的“三联疗法”为例,我们将评估局部区域溶栓,将导管楔入血栓,并通过腔内过滤器暂时阻断腔静脉,是否可以更好地溶解血栓而不发生肺栓塞。在我们的单元中,18例近端深静脉血栓患者采用溶栓治疗,6例采用全身治疗,3例采用局部治疗,最后9例采用重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂进行局部溶栓治疗。我们获得了10例完全溶解,1例全身治疗,9例局部局部治疗。没有重大并发症。因此,我们认为,与动脉局部区域溶栓相比,低剂量的rt-PA静脉局部区域溶栓,与暂时性腔静脉中断相关,可能比全身治疗获得更好的溶栓效果,而且没有肺栓塞的风险,出血风险非常低。此外,局部溶栓,通过更快的血栓溶解,可以更好地预防静脉后综合征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Phlebologie
Phlebologie 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Als Forum für die europäische phlebologische Wissenschaft widmet sich die CME-zertifizierte Zeitschrift allen relevanten phlebologischen Themen in Forschung und Praxis: Neue diagnostische Verfahren, präventivmedizinische Fragen sowie therapeutische Maßnahmen werden in Original- und Übersichtsarbeiten diskutiert.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信