[Discrepancy between Apgar score and umbilical artery pH value in the newborn infant. (Correlation to mode of delivery and fetal outcome?)].

R Obwegeser, R Böhm, W Gruber
{"title":"[Discrepancy between Apgar score and umbilical artery pH value in the newborn infant. (Correlation to mode of delivery and fetal outcome?)].","authors":"R Obwegeser,&nbsp;R Böhm,&nbsp;W Gruber","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a retrospective study data from more than 9000 live births were analyzed. Our aim was to compare the significance of Apgar-Score and umbilical artery pH in predicting the condition and development of the newborn. We were particularly interested in three groups of patients: \"Group A\" included patients with a 5 minute Apgar-Score < or = 7 and a normal pH > 7,2. In \"Group P\" the pH was < 7,10 combined with a normal Apgar-Score (8 to 10). Both groups were compared with a \"normal group\" (pH > 7,20 and Apgar-Score between 8 and 10). There was a higher percentage of operative deliveries in group A (38%) and group P (20%) compared to the normal group (15%). The only predictor of a low Apgar-Score was meconium stained amniotic fluid (Group A 16%). A poor condition of the newborn correlated much better with a low Apgar-Score than with a low umbilical artery pH. In group A the rate of newborns transferred to the neonatology unit was 43% and the perinatal mortality rate was 50%. The poor correlation of a low umbilical artery pH and the fetal outcome is partly explainable by the standard cut off level of 7,20 for acidosis, which seems to be too high.</p>","PeriodicalId":23919,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie","volume":"197 2","pages":"59-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a retrospective study data from more than 9000 live births were analyzed. Our aim was to compare the significance of Apgar-Score and umbilical artery pH in predicting the condition and development of the newborn. We were particularly interested in three groups of patients: "Group A" included patients with a 5 minute Apgar-Score < or = 7 and a normal pH > 7,2. In "Group P" the pH was < 7,10 combined with a normal Apgar-Score (8 to 10). Both groups were compared with a "normal group" (pH > 7,20 and Apgar-Score between 8 and 10). There was a higher percentage of operative deliveries in group A (38%) and group P (20%) compared to the normal group (15%). The only predictor of a low Apgar-Score was meconium stained amniotic fluid (Group A 16%). A poor condition of the newborn correlated much better with a low Apgar-Score than with a low umbilical artery pH. In group A the rate of newborns transferred to the neonatology unit was 43% and the perinatal mortality rate was 50%. The poor correlation of a low umbilical artery pH and the fetal outcome is partly explainable by the standard cut off level of 7,20 for acidosis, which seems to be too high.

新生儿Apgar评分与脐动脉pH值的差异。(是否与分娩方式和胎儿结局有关?)
在一项回顾性研究中,对9000多名活产婴儿的数据进行了分析。我们的目的是比较Apgar-Score和脐动脉pH值在预测新生儿状况和发育方面的意义。我们对三组患者特别感兴趣:“A组”包括5分钟apgar评分<或= 7和正常pH值> 7,2的患者。P组pH < 7,10, Apgar-Score正常(8 ~ 10)。两组均与“正常组”(pH > 7、20,Apgar-Score在8 ~ 10之间)进行比较。与正常组(15%)相比,a组(38%)和P组(20%)的手术分娩率更高。低apgar评分的唯一预测因子是胎粪染色羊水(a组16%)。新生儿的不良状况与低apgar评分的相关性要比与低脐动脉ph的相关性强得多。在A组中,新生儿转到新生儿病房的比率为43%,围产期死亡率为50%。低脐动脉pH值与胎儿结局的相关性较差,部分原因是酸中毒的标准临界值为7.20,这似乎太高了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信