Double-blind comparison of butorphanol and nalbuphine on the common bile duct by ultrasonography in man.

Z E Vieira, E K Zsigmond, B Duarte, S A Renigers, K Hirota
{"title":"Double-blind comparison of butorphanol and nalbuphine on the common bile duct by ultrasonography in man.","authors":"Z E Vieira,&nbsp;E K Zsigmond,&nbsp;B Duarte,&nbsp;S A Renigers,&nbsp;K Hirota","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Butorphanol and nalbuphine, narcotic agonist-antagonists were shown to cause no increase in biliary pressure in contrast to morphine in dogs or men. A non-invasive, ultrasonographic technique confirmed that morphine caused constriction of the common bile duct while placebo caused no effect. To prove the lack of constrictive effect of butorphanol and nalbuphine on the common bile duct, the changes in its diameter were measured following placebo or the two agonist-antagonists by ultrasonography. In a double-blind, randomized study, 17 patients undergoing open cholecystectomy were evaluated. No morphine or opioids were allowed for 12 hours prior to the study. After premedication with midazolam and glycopyrrolate, anesthesia was induced by midazolam, 50 micrograms.kg-1 and thiopental, 3.0-5.0 mg.kg-1. Tracheal intubation was facilitated by succinylcholine 1.0 mg.kg-1 and muscle relaxation was maintained with vecuronium. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane or enflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. After imaging the common bile duct by ultrasonography, placebo, nalbuphine 0.3 mg.kg-1 or butorphanol 40 micrograms.kg-1 were injected intravenously. The diameter of the common bile duct was measured before and at 4 and 8 minutes after drug administration. One-way analysis of variance and paired t-test were utilized for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was considered significant. No significant changes in the common bile duct diameter was observed after placebo administration, nor was any change observed after either nalbuphine or butorphanol as compared to the baseline. The comparison of three groups of patients showed no statistically significant difference.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":13817,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","volume":"31 11","pages":"564-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy, and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Butorphanol and nalbuphine, narcotic agonist-antagonists were shown to cause no increase in biliary pressure in contrast to morphine in dogs or men. A non-invasive, ultrasonographic technique confirmed that morphine caused constriction of the common bile duct while placebo caused no effect. To prove the lack of constrictive effect of butorphanol and nalbuphine on the common bile duct, the changes in its diameter were measured following placebo or the two agonist-antagonists by ultrasonography. In a double-blind, randomized study, 17 patients undergoing open cholecystectomy were evaluated. No morphine or opioids were allowed for 12 hours prior to the study. After premedication with midazolam and glycopyrrolate, anesthesia was induced by midazolam, 50 micrograms.kg-1 and thiopental, 3.0-5.0 mg.kg-1. Tracheal intubation was facilitated by succinylcholine 1.0 mg.kg-1 and muscle relaxation was maintained with vecuronium. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane or enflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. After imaging the common bile duct by ultrasonography, placebo, nalbuphine 0.3 mg.kg-1 or butorphanol 40 micrograms.kg-1 were injected intravenously. The diameter of the common bile duct was measured before and at 4 and 8 minutes after drug administration. One-way analysis of variance and paired t-test were utilized for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was considered significant. No significant changes in the common bile duct diameter was observed after placebo administration, nor was any change observed after either nalbuphine or butorphanol as compared to the baseline. The comparison of three groups of patients showed no statistically significant difference.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

布托啡诺与纳布啡对人胆总管超声检查的双盲比较。
与吗啡相比,布托啡诺和纳布啡这两种麻醉性激动剂拮抗剂对犬和人的胆道压力没有增加作用。一种非侵入性超声技术证实吗啡引起胆总管收缩,而安慰剂则没有作用。为了证明布托啡诺和纳布啡对胆总管没有收缩作用,我们用超声测量了安慰剂或两种激动拮抗剂后胆总管直径的变化。在一项双盲随机研究中,对17例接受开腹胆囊切除术的患者进行了评估。研究前12小时不允许使用吗啡或阿片类药物。用药前给予咪达唑仑、甘炔罗酸钠,以咪达唑仑50微克诱导麻醉。Kg-1和硫喷妥,3.0-5.0 mg.kg-1。用琥珀酰胆碱1.0 mg辅助气管插管。维库溴铵维持Kg-1和肌肉松弛。麻醉用异氟醚或安氟醚加氧氧化亚氮维持。胆总管超声显像后,给予安慰剂、纳布啡0.3 mg。Kg-1或丁托啡醇40微克。Kg-1静脉注射。分别于给药前、给药后4、8分钟测量胆总管直径。采用单因素方差分析和配对t检验进行统计分析。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。与基线相比,服用安慰剂后胆总管直径没有明显变化,服用纳布啡或布托啡诺后也没有任何变化。三组患者比较,差异无统计学意义。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信