Evaluating research for clinical practice. A guide for practitioners.

Clinics in communication disorders Pub Date : 1993-01-01
D M Ruscello
{"title":"Evaluating research for clinical practice. A guide for practitioners.","authors":"D M Ruscello","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This has been only a brief treatment of the topic, but one should note that research is an integral part of our clinical practice. If it were not for research our profession would remain static because our understanding of communicative disorders would not change. Instead, there has been a research commitment that has greatly increased our knowledge base. One only need look at the advances in assessment/treatment and the diversity in scope of practice to appreciate research. A profession well grounded in research is a profession that will continue to meet the challenges of the future. We need a strong research base to improve our services to communicatively handicapped persons, and practitioners must be active consumers of this research. The clinician and researcher share a common ground and must communicate with each other (Ringel, 1972). In practice, the speech-language pathologist needs to have a working knowledge of research, since she/he must continually deal with a variety of clinical problems. New tests and measurement procedures, treatments and other critical issues of the profession are subject to experimental scrutiny. It is up to the practitioner to critically examine an issue and then make a rational decision. Moll (1983) has indicated that rational clinical decisions are made on the basis of research and current clinical practice. There is no \"cookbook\" approach to utilizing research, but there are things that speech/language pathologists can do. First, one must read the literature and interpret the data. If research is to be utilized, make note of its success or lack of success.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77075,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in communication disorders","volume":"3 3","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in communication disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This has been only a brief treatment of the topic, but one should note that research is an integral part of our clinical practice. If it were not for research our profession would remain static because our understanding of communicative disorders would not change. Instead, there has been a research commitment that has greatly increased our knowledge base. One only need look at the advances in assessment/treatment and the diversity in scope of practice to appreciate research. A profession well grounded in research is a profession that will continue to meet the challenges of the future. We need a strong research base to improve our services to communicatively handicapped persons, and practitioners must be active consumers of this research. The clinician and researcher share a common ground and must communicate with each other (Ringel, 1972). In practice, the speech-language pathologist needs to have a working knowledge of research, since she/he must continually deal with a variety of clinical problems. New tests and measurement procedures, treatments and other critical issues of the profession are subject to experimental scrutiny. It is up to the practitioner to critically examine an issue and then make a rational decision. Moll (1983) has indicated that rational clinical decisions are made on the basis of research and current clinical practice. There is no "cookbook" approach to utilizing research, but there are things that speech/language pathologists can do. First, one must read the literature and interpret the data. If research is to be utilized, make note of its success or lack of success.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

临床实践评价研究。从业人员指南。
这只是对该主题的简短处理,但应该注意的是,研究是我们临床实践的一个组成部分。如果没有研究,我们的职业将保持不变,因为我们对交流障碍的理解不会改变。相反,有一项研究承诺极大地增加了我们的知识库。人们只需要看看评估/治疗的进步和实践范围的多样性就能欣赏研究。一个以研究为基础的职业是一个将继续迎接未来挑战的职业。我们需要一个强大的研究基础来改善我们对沟通障碍人士的服务,而从业者必须积极参与这项研究。临床医生和研究人员有共同点,必须相互沟通(Ringel, 1972)。在实践中,语言病理学家需要有研究的工作知识,因为她/他必须不断地处理各种临床问题。新的测试和测量程序,处理和其他关键问题的专业受到实验审查。这取决于从业者批判性地审视一个问题,然后做出理性的决定。Moll(1983)指出,理性的临床决策是在研究和当前临床实践的基础上做出的。没有“食谱”的方法来利用研究,但言语/语言病理学家可以做一些事情。首先,必须阅读文献并解释数据。如果要利用研究成果,请记下其成功或失败之处。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信