Missed opportunities in preventive pediatric health care. Immunizations or well-child care visits?

J Brown, P Melinkovich, B Gitterman, S Ricketts
{"title":"Missed opportunities in preventive pediatric health care. Immunizations or well-child care visits?","authors":"J Brown,&nbsp;P Melinkovich,&nbsp;B Gitterman,&nbsp;S Ricketts","doi":"10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160340067016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the percentage of patients in a large pediatric practice in compliance with national recommendations regarding immunizations and well-child care visits.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Chart review. Point estimates with 95% confidence intervals were determined for reviewed charts in compliance with recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and schedule of well-child care visits, screening, and anticipatory guidance recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A large, multisite urban public pediatric practice.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Three hundred eighty-six infants and children (aged 0 to 60 months) who had a total of 7595 patient visits.</p><p><strong>Selection procedure: </strong>A random sample of charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a large discrepancy in compliance for patients aged 0 to 23 months in ACIP-recommended immunizations (90.5% +/- 3.9%) vs AAP-recommended well-child care visits (37.6% +/- 6.4%) and for patients aged 24 to 60 months in ACIP-recommended immunizations (87.8% +/- 5.1%) vs AAP-recommended well-child care visits (31.0% +/- 7.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data suggest that immunization alone does not ensure that children will receive all aspects of preventive care, raising questions about the practicality of the current AAP recommendations for preventive pediatric health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":75474,"journal":{"name":"American journal of diseases of children (1960)","volume":"147 10","pages":"1081-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160340067016","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of diseases of children (1960)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160340067016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Objective: To determine the percentage of patients in a large pediatric practice in compliance with national recommendations regarding immunizations and well-child care visits.

Research design: Chart review. Point estimates with 95% confidence intervals were determined for reviewed charts in compliance with recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and schedule of well-child care visits, screening, and anticipatory guidance recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

Setting: A large, multisite urban public pediatric practice.

Patients: Three hundred eighty-six infants and children (aged 0 to 60 months) who had a total of 7595 patient visits.

Selection procedure: A random sample of charts.

Results: There was a large discrepancy in compliance for patients aged 0 to 23 months in ACIP-recommended immunizations (90.5% +/- 3.9%) vs AAP-recommended well-child care visits (37.6% +/- 6.4%) and for patients aged 24 to 60 months in ACIP-recommended immunizations (87.8% +/- 5.1%) vs AAP-recommended well-child care visits (31.0% +/- 7.1%).

Conclusions: The data suggest that immunization alone does not ensure that children will receive all aspects of preventive care, raising questions about the practicality of the current AAP recommendations for preventive pediatric health care.

错过了预防儿科保健的机会。免疫接种或儿童保健访问?
目的:确定一个大型儿科诊所的患者在遵守国家关于免疫接种和儿童保健就诊建议的百分比。研究设计:图表回顾。根据疾病控制和预防中心免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)的建议,以及美国儿科学会(AAP)推荐的儿童保健访问、筛查和预期指导的时间表,确定了具有95%置信区间的点估计。环境:一个大型的、多站点的城市公共儿科诊所。患者:386名婴儿和儿童(0至60个月),共有7595名患者就诊。选择程序:随机抽取图表样本。结果:0 ~ 23月龄患者对acip推荐的免疫接种依从性(90.5% +/- 3.9%)与aap推荐的儿童保健就诊依从性(37.6% +/- 6.4%)差异较大,24 ~ 60月龄患者对acip推荐的免疫接种依从性(87.8% +/- 5.1%)与aap推荐的儿童保健就诊依从性(31.0% +/- 7.1%)差异较大。结论:数据表明,单靠免疫接种并不能确保儿童获得所有方面的预防保健,这就对目前美国儿科学会建议的预防性儿科保健的实用性提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信