[Clinic structure and timely management of emergency cesarean section--reference values and recommendations].

V M Roemer, G Heger-Römermann
{"title":"[Clinic structure and timely management of emergency cesarean section--reference values and recommendations].","authors":"V M Roemer,&nbsp;G Heger-Römermann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>This retrospective clinical study was performed to analyze the relationship between the time course of an emergency Cesarean Section and the structural, logistic and circadian aspects of the clinical environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Statistical analysis was based on architectural and structural data from 132 Departments of Obstetrics in the region of Northrhine-Westfalia, Germany. Hospitals were compared in four groups of equal size defined by the number of deliveries per year. Data were available on 207 emergency C-Sections from 66 participating hospitals. The time of the day of each delivery was rounded to full hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The size of the hospital was a highly significant predictor (p < 0.001) of the time elapsing between decision making and delivery (DD-interval) and of the preparation time required prior to the start of the operation: With increasing number of yearly deliveries the DD interval decreased from 31 minutes (SD = 15) to 19 minutes (SD = 7) with respective set-up times of 26 minutes (SD = 15) and 15 minutes (SD = 7) respectively. The time of the day had a significant influence on both variables (p < 0.05) with emergency C-Sections being slowest between 1:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. The mean time intervals observed may serve as a reference for the individual hospital situation: A preparation time of 15 minutes, time from start of surgery until delivery of 4 minutes and a DD interval of 19 minutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data presented in this study underline the importance of the immediate availability of a complete emergency team consisting of midwife, obstetrician, anesthesiologist, OR nursing staff and pediatrician. While not necessarily arguing in favor of a concentration of obstetrical practice in specialized centers, the following recommendations might be worth considering for any given clinical setting: 1. Immediate availability of a complete team is essential, especially during the night. 2. Well defined steps of urgency in agreement between all disciplines involved improve communication and save time. 3. The emergency C-Section in the delivery room may be a worthwhile alternative in the individual case. 4. Flexibility in the decision making process may increase efficiency. 5. Practice drills may help to identify weaknesses in the interaction and coordination of the team. 6. A functional hospital architecture is important to avoid unnecessary and uncontrollable delays. 7. Adequate training programs for the obstetrical team are essential with special emphasis on the early diagnosis of fetal distress and maternal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23919,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal: This retrospective clinical study was performed to analyze the relationship between the time course of an emergency Cesarean Section and the structural, logistic and circadian aspects of the clinical environment.

Methods: Statistical analysis was based on architectural and structural data from 132 Departments of Obstetrics in the region of Northrhine-Westfalia, Germany. Hospitals were compared in four groups of equal size defined by the number of deliveries per year. Data were available on 207 emergency C-Sections from 66 participating hospitals. The time of the day of each delivery was rounded to full hours.

Results: The size of the hospital was a highly significant predictor (p < 0.001) of the time elapsing between decision making and delivery (DD-interval) and of the preparation time required prior to the start of the operation: With increasing number of yearly deliveries the DD interval decreased from 31 minutes (SD = 15) to 19 minutes (SD = 7) with respective set-up times of 26 minutes (SD = 15) and 15 minutes (SD = 7) respectively. The time of the day had a significant influence on both variables (p < 0.05) with emergency C-Sections being slowest between 1:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. The mean time intervals observed may serve as a reference for the individual hospital situation: A preparation time of 15 minutes, time from start of surgery until delivery of 4 minutes and a DD interval of 19 minutes.

Conclusions: The data presented in this study underline the importance of the immediate availability of a complete emergency team consisting of midwife, obstetrician, anesthesiologist, OR nursing staff and pediatrician. While not necessarily arguing in favor of a concentration of obstetrical practice in specialized centers, the following recommendations might be worth considering for any given clinical setting: 1. Immediate availability of a complete team is essential, especially during the night. 2. Well defined steps of urgency in agreement between all disciplines involved improve communication and save time. 3. The emergency C-Section in the delivery room may be a worthwhile alternative in the individual case. 4. Flexibility in the decision making process may increase efficiency. 5. Practice drills may help to identify weaknesses in the interaction and coordination of the team. 6. A functional hospital architecture is important to avoid unnecessary and uncontrollable delays. 7. Adequate training programs for the obstetrical team are essential with special emphasis on the early diagnosis of fetal distress and maternal complications.

【急诊剖宫产的临床结构与及时管理——参考价值与建议】
目的:本回顾性临床研究分析急诊剖宫产的时间过程与临床环境的结构、后勤和昼夜节律方面的关系。方法:对德国北威斯特法利州132个产科的建筑和结构资料进行统计分析。将医院按每年分娩次数划分为四组,每组大小相同。来自66家参与医院的207次紧急剖腹产数据。每次分娩的时间都四舍五入到整小时。结果:医院的规模是决策和分娩之间的时间间隔(DD-interval)和手术开始前所需的准备时间的高度显著预测因子(p < 0.001):随着每年分娩次数的增加,DD间隔从31分钟(SD = 15)减少到19分钟(SD = 7),分别为26分钟(SD = 15)和15分钟(SD = 7)。一天中的时间对两个变量都有显著影响(p < 0.05),其中凌晨1点至7点是紧急剖腹产最慢的时间。观察到的平均时间间隔可作为个别医院情况的参考:准备时间为15分钟,从手术开始至分娩时间为4分钟,DD间隔为19分钟。结论:本研究中提供的数据强调了由助产士、产科医生、麻醉师、手术室护理人员和儿科医生组成的完整急诊小组的重要性。虽然不一定赞成产科实践集中在专业中心,以下建议可能值得考虑任何给定的临床环境:1。立即提供一个完整的团队是必不可少的,特别是在夜间。2. 在所有相关学科之间达成一致的明确的紧急步骤可以改善沟通并节省时间。3.在产房的紧急剖腹产可能是一个值得选择的个别情况。4. 决策过程中的灵活性可以提高效率。5. 练习可以帮助找出团队互动和协调中的弱点。6. 功能性的医院架构对于避免不必要和无法控制的延误非常重要。7. 为产科团队提供充分的培训计划是必要的,特别强调胎儿窘迫和产妇并发症的早期诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信