Validity of physician self-report in tracking patient education objectives.

D L Roter, N K Russell
{"title":"Validity of physician self-report in tracking patient education objectives.","authors":"D L Roter,&nbsp;N K Russell","doi":"10.1177/109019819402100105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient education objectives are included as a strategy in every health promotion area addressed in Healthy People 2000. The likelihood of accomplishing these objectives is linked to the accuracy of the baseline estimates of practice. These estimates have most usually relied upon patient and physician reports. However, the accuracy of these reports has been infrequently studied. We analyzed audiotapes of interactions among 377 adult chronic disease patients and 38 physicians in a variety of practice settings to estimate the accuracy of their reports. Our findings indicate that neither doctors nor patients provide a consistently accurate reflection of health promotion discussions, nor do they appear to agree with one another very much as to what was discussed. Smoking and diet were reported quite accurately by both doctors and patients, whereas discussions regarding physical activity, alcohol, and stress were less so. Further, our findings suggest that underreport may pose an even greater threat to accurate estimates of physician practice than overreports.</p>","PeriodicalId":77155,"journal":{"name":"Health education quarterly","volume":"21 1","pages":"27-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/109019819402100105","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819402100105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Patient education objectives are included as a strategy in every health promotion area addressed in Healthy People 2000. The likelihood of accomplishing these objectives is linked to the accuracy of the baseline estimates of practice. These estimates have most usually relied upon patient and physician reports. However, the accuracy of these reports has been infrequently studied. We analyzed audiotapes of interactions among 377 adult chronic disease patients and 38 physicians in a variety of practice settings to estimate the accuracy of their reports. Our findings indicate that neither doctors nor patients provide a consistently accurate reflection of health promotion discussions, nor do they appear to agree with one another very much as to what was discussed. Smoking and diet were reported quite accurately by both doctors and patients, whereas discussions regarding physical activity, alcohol, and stress were less so. Further, our findings suggest that underreport may pose an even greater threat to accurate estimates of physician practice than overreports.

医生自我报告在跟踪患者教育目标方面的有效性。
《2000年健康人》将患者教育目标作为一项战略纳入了涉及的每个健康促进领域。实现这些目标的可能性与实践基线估计的准确性有关。这些估计通常依赖于病人和医生的报告。然而,很少有人研究这些报告的准确性。我们分析了377名成年慢性病患者和38名医生在各种实践环境中相互作用的录音带,以估计他们报告的准确性。我们的研究结果表明,无论是医生还是患者都不能始终如一地准确反映健康促进的讨论,他们似乎也不太同意彼此所讨论的内容。医生和病人都很准确地报告了吸烟和饮食,而关于体育活动、酒精和压力的讨论则不那么准确。此外,我们的研究结果表明,少报可能比多报对医生实践的准确估计构成更大的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信