Comparative antimicrobial effectiveness of a substantive (0.12% chlorhexidine) and a nonsubstantive (phenolic) mouthrinse in vivo and in vitro.

W W Briner, G A Kayrouz, M X Chanak
{"title":"Comparative antimicrobial effectiveness of a substantive (0.12% chlorhexidine) and a nonsubstantive (phenolic) mouthrinse in vivo and in vitro.","authors":"W W Briner,&nbsp;G A Kayrouz,&nbsp;M X Chanak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial mouthrinses can play an important role in maintaining oral health by killing cariogenic organisms and preventing plaque and gingivitis. The active ingredients are adsorbed by oral tissues and then gradually released into the saliva. In this article, the effectiveness of a substantive chlorhexidine and a nonsubstantive phenolic antimicrobial mouthrinse were tested. When compared, the results indicated that the two types of mouthrinses are equally effective at killing salivary microbes for up to 30 minutes after rinsing. The prescriptive substantive rinse, however, continued its microbicidal effect for a longer duration (up to 5 hours) than the over-the-counter nonsubstantive rinse. The substantive rinse showed pronounced and measurable zones of inhibition around each well in the agar diffusion assay where the nonsubstantive rinse showed no zone around any well at any time. The substantive rinse also showed a superior ability to inhibit the growth of 28 oral microbes, including some putative periodontopathogens, which were assayed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55234,"journal":{"name":"Compendium-Continuing Education for Veterinarians","volume":"15 9","pages":"1158, 1160, 1162 passim; quiz 1170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compendium-Continuing Education for Veterinarians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial mouthrinses can play an important role in maintaining oral health by killing cariogenic organisms and preventing plaque and gingivitis. The active ingredients are adsorbed by oral tissues and then gradually released into the saliva. In this article, the effectiveness of a substantive chlorhexidine and a nonsubstantive phenolic antimicrobial mouthrinse were tested. When compared, the results indicated that the two types of mouthrinses are equally effective at killing salivary microbes for up to 30 minutes after rinsing. The prescriptive substantive rinse, however, continued its microbicidal effect for a longer duration (up to 5 hours) than the over-the-counter nonsubstantive rinse. The substantive rinse showed pronounced and measurable zones of inhibition around each well in the agar diffusion assay where the nonsubstantive rinse showed no zone around any well at any time. The substantive rinse also showed a superior ability to inhibit the growth of 28 oral microbes, including some putative periodontopathogens, which were assayed.

实质性(0.12%氯己定)和非实质性(酚类)漱口水在体内和体外的抗菌效果比较。
抗菌漱口水可以杀死致龋微生物,预防牙菌斑和牙龈炎,在维持口腔健康方面发挥重要作用。有效成分被口腔组织吸附,然后逐渐释放到唾液中。本文对一种实质性氯己定和一种非实质性酚类抗菌漱口水的有效性进行了测试。经过比较,结果表明,两种漱口水在冲洗后长达30分钟内杀死唾液微生物的效果相同。然而,规定的实质性冲洗比非处方的非实质性冲洗持续更长的时间(长达5小时)。在琼脂扩散实验中,实质性漂洗在每个孔周围显示出明显和可测量的抑制区,而非实质性漂洗在任何时候都没有在任何孔周围显示出任何区域。实质性漱口水还显示出优越的抑制28种口腔微生物生长的能力,包括一些假定的牙周病病原体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信