Neuroprotective NMDA antagonists: the controversy over their potential for adverse effects on cortical neuronal morphology.

R J Hargreaves, R G Hill, L L Iversen
{"title":"Neuroprotective NMDA antagonists: the controversy over their potential for adverse effects on cortical neuronal morphology.","authors":"R J Hargreaves,&nbsp;R G Hill,&nbsp;L L Iversen","doi":"10.1007/978-3-7091-9334-1_4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been reported that several uncompetitive NMDA receptor ion channel blocking agents (phencyclidine, ketamine, dizocilpine, dextrorphan) cause transient reversible vacuolation in neurons in the posterior cingulate cortex of rats. Similar effects have also been observed with competitive glutamate antagonists such as CPP, CGS 19755 and CGP 37849. This transient morphological change has been noted to be coincident anatomically with brain regions showing hypermetabolism after administration of uncompetitive NMDA receptor ion channel blockers and competitive glutamate antagonists. These results therefore indicate that the functional consequences of NMDA receptor blockade with competitive glutamate and uncompetitive channel antagonists are ultimately the same. These changes do not appear to be a prelude to irreversible damage except after relatively high doses of the receptor ion channel antagonists but they have given rise to concern over the safety in use of NMDA antagonists as neuroprotective agents. In contrast, vacuolation has not yet been demonstrated with agents acting at the glycine (L-687,414) or polyamine (eliprodil) modulatory sites of the NMDA receptor complex suggesting that agents acting at these sites may have a greater potential therapeutic window.</p>","PeriodicalId":75393,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum","volume":"60 ","pages":"15-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9334-1_4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

It has been reported that several uncompetitive NMDA receptor ion channel blocking agents (phencyclidine, ketamine, dizocilpine, dextrorphan) cause transient reversible vacuolation in neurons in the posterior cingulate cortex of rats. Similar effects have also been observed with competitive glutamate antagonists such as CPP, CGS 19755 and CGP 37849. This transient morphological change has been noted to be coincident anatomically with brain regions showing hypermetabolism after administration of uncompetitive NMDA receptor ion channel blockers and competitive glutamate antagonists. These results therefore indicate that the functional consequences of NMDA receptor blockade with competitive glutamate and uncompetitive channel antagonists are ultimately the same. These changes do not appear to be a prelude to irreversible damage except after relatively high doses of the receptor ion channel antagonists but they have given rise to concern over the safety in use of NMDA antagonists as neuroprotective agents. In contrast, vacuolation has not yet been demonstrated with agents acting at the glycine (L-687,414) or polyamine (eliprodil) modulatory sites of the NMDA receptor complex suggesting that agents acting at these sites may have a greater potential therapeutic window.

神经保护性NMDA拮抗剂:对皮质神经元形态学潜在不利影响的争议。
据报道,几种非竞争性的NMDA受体离子通道阻滞剂(苯环利定、氯胺酮、二唑西平、右旋芬)可引起大鼠后扣带皮层神经元瞬间可逆的空泡化。竞争性谷氨酸拮抗剂如CPP、CGS 19755和CGP 37849也观察到类似的效果。这种短暂的形态学改变在解剖学上与服用非竞争性NMDA受体离子通道阻滞剂和竞争性谷氨酸拮抗剂后显示高代谢的脑区域一致。因此,这些结果表明,竞争性谷氨酸和非竞争性通道拮抗剂阻断NMDA受体的功能后果最终是相同的。除非使用相对高剂量的受体离子通道拮抗剂,否则这些变化似乎不是不可逆损伤的前奏,但它们引起了对NMDA拮抗剂作为神经保护剂使用安全性的关注。相比之下,作用于NMDA受体复合物的甘氨酸(L-687,414)或多胺(eliprodil)调节位点的药物尚未证明空泡化,这表明作用于这些位点的药物可能具有更大的潜在治疗窗口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信