A rapid and reliable assay to enumerate CD4+ T lymphocytes in whole blood.

O C Ferreira, G Suleiman, C Brites, P Novoa, M Piovesana, J Suleiman, R H Kanayama, T R Russel, R Zwerner, W Harrington
{"title":"A rapid and reliable assay to enumerate CD4+ T lymphocytes in whole blood.","authors":"O C Ferreira,&nbsp;G Suleiman,&nbsp;C Brites,&nbsp;P Novoa,&nbsp;M Piovesana,&nbsp;J Suleiman,&nbsp;R H Kanayama,&nbsp;T R Russel,&nbsp;R Zwerner,&nbsp;W Harrington","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared the performance of a rapid and simple anti-CD4 antibody-coated microsphere assay with flow cytometry and immunofluorescence for quantitation of absolute count of CD4+ T lymphocytes. A longitudinal evaluation of CD4+ T lymphocytes by flow cytometry and microsphere assay in 10 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seronegative and 59 HIV-seropositive individuals was conducted over a period of 9 months. Standard flow cytometry analysis was performed to establish the absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte count. The microsphere assay uses whole blood; CD14+ and CD4+ cells are first blocked by small latex beads coated with anti-CD14 antibody, and remaining cells are stained with larger anti-CD4 antibody-coated beads. Cells rosetted with only anti-CD4 antibody-coated beads are counted with use of a hemacytometer. Immunofluorescence microscopy was performed by standard techniques with use of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The predictive value for stratification of HIV-seropositive patients by CD4+ T-lymphocyte values of < 200/microliters was 95% when the microsphere method was compared with flow cytometry. A correlation coefficient of 0.91 between the two assay methods was demonstrated in 281 CD4+ T-lymphocyte tests for absolute count. Finally, the flow cytometry method yielded better results than did the microsphere assay and immunofluorescence microscopy, in descending order of accuracy. The microsphere method should be effective in determining absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte count in developing countries where, for a variety of reasons, no other method can be reliably performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes","volume":"7 12","pages":"1224-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compared the performance of a rapid and simple anti-CD4 antibody-coated microsphere assay with flow cytometry and immunofluorescence for quantitation of absolute count of CD4+ T lymphocytes. A longitudinal evaluation of CD4+ T lymphocytes by flow cytometry and microsphere assay in 10 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seronegative and 59 HIV-seropositive individuals was conducted over a period of 9 months. Standard flow cytometry analysis was performed to establish the absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte count. The microsphere assay uses whole blood; CD14+ and CD4+ cells are first blocked by small latex beads coated with anti-CD14 antibody, and remaining cells are stained with larger anti-CD4 antibody-coated beads. Cells rosetted with only anti-CD4 antibody-coated beads are counted with use of a hemacytometer. Immunofluorescence microscopy was performed by standard techniques with use of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The predictive value for stratification of HIV-seropositive patients by CD4+ T-lymphocyte values of < 200/microliters was 95% when the microsphere method was compared with flow cytometry. A correlation coefficient of 0.91 between the two assay methods was demonstrated in 281 CD4+ T-lymphocyte tests for absolute count. Finally, the flow cytometry method yielded better results than did the microsphere assay and immunofluorescence microscopy, in descending order of accuracy. The microsphere method should be effective in determining absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte count in developing countries where, for a variety of reasons, no other method can be reliably performed.

一种快速可靠的全血CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数方法。
我们比较了快速和简单的抗CD4抗体包被微球测定与流式细胞术和免疫荧光定量CD4+ T淋巴细胞绝对计数的性能。用流式细胞术和微球法对10例人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)血清阴性和59例HIV血清阳性个体的CD4+ T淋巴细胞进行了为期9个月的纵向评估。采用标准流式细胞术测定CD4+ t淋巴细胞绝对计数。微球法使用全血;CD14+和CD4+细胞首先被涂有抗CD14抗体的小乳胶珠阻断,剩余细胞用涂有抗CD4抗体的大乳胶珠染色。仅用抗cd4抗体包被珠结的细胞用血细胞计计数。免疫荧光显微镜采用标准技术,使用外周血单个核细胞。与流式细胞术比较,CD4+ t淋巴细胞值< 200/微升对hiv血清阳性患者分层的预测价值为95%。在281例CD4+ t淋巴细胞绝对计数中,两种检测方法的相关系数为0.91。最后,流式细胞术比微球法和免疫荧光显微镜的准确度由高到低。在发展中国家,由于各种原因,没有其他方法可以可靠地执行,微球法应该是确定CD4+ t淋巴细胞绝对计数的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信