Carbon negative geothermal: Theoretical efficiency and sequestration potential of geothermal-BECCS energy cycles

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
K.A. Titus, D.E. Dempsey, R.A.M. Peer
{"title":"Carbon negative geothermal: Theoretical efficiency and sequestration potential of geothermal-BECCS energy cycles","authors":"K.A. Titus,&nbsp;D.E. Dempsey,&nbsp;R.A.M. Peer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Geothermal systems are an attractive option for baseload electricity generation with low emissions intensity (average 122 gCO<sub>2</sub>/kWh). However, about 70% of geothermal systems are low or medium enthalpy (&lt;160°C), which often renders them uneconomic to develop for electricity production. A solution to increase both power production and utilization efficiency of these systems is hybridization with a biomass fuel source. In this work, we introduce and verify the concept of biomass hybridization combined with in-line dissolution and reinjection of biomass flue CO<sub>2</sub>. This subclass of bioenergy and carbon capture and storage (BECCS), termed geothermal-BECCS, has improved power production and negative CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. This dual approach of using geothermal systems for power production and as carbon sinks can be a potential decarbonisation tool in areas with suitable geothermal and bioenergy resources.</p><p>Here, we quantify the thermodynamic and sequestration performance of four geothermal-BECCS configurations. Up to 100% of flue gas is dissolved and reinjected with the spent geofluid. Scaled to a 1 kg/s geofluid production rate, flash and binary benchmark plants generated 32 and 43 kWe at efficiencies of 6 and 8%, respectively. In comparison, four geothermal-BECCS designs yielded 64 kWe at 9% efficiency (flash plant), 76 kWe at 9% efficiency (ORC binary plant), 62 kWe at 7% efficiency (compound flash-binary plant), and 589 kWe at 20% efficiency (bioenergy based geothermal-preheat plant). Annual biogenic CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration rates ranged from 217 to 675 tonnes per kg/s with emissions intensities from -131 to -922 gCO<sub>2</sub>/kWh. By simultaneously boosting low-emissions energy and sequestering biogenic CO<sub>2</sub>, geothermal-BECCS promises to be an essential technology for meeting climate targets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103813"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583622002316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geothermal systems are an attractive option for baseload electricity generation with low emissions intensity (average 122 gCO2/kWh). However, about 70% of geothermal systems are low or medium enthalpy (<160°C), which often renders them uneconomic to develop for electricity production. A solution to increase both power production and utilization efficiency of these systems is hybridization with a biomass fuel source. In this work, we introduce and verify the concept of biomass hybridization combined with in-line dissolution and reinjection of biomass flue CO2. This subclass of bioenergy and carbon capture and storage (BECCS), termed geothermal-BECCS, has improved power production and negative CO2 emissions. This dual approach of using geothermal systems for power production and as carbon sinks can be a potential decarbonisation tool in areas with suitable geothermal and bioenergy resources.

Here, we quantify the thermodynamic and sequestration performance of four geothermal-BECCS configurations. Up to 100% of flue gas is dissolved and reinjected with the spent geofluid. Scaled to a 1 kg/s geofluid production rate, flash and binary benchmark plants generated 32 and 43 kWe at efficiencies of 6 and 8%, respectively. In comparison, four geothermal-BECCS designs yielded 64 kWe at 9% efficiency (flash plant), 76 kWe at 9% efficiency (ORC binary plant), 62 kWe at 7% efficiency (compound flash-binary plant), and 589 kWe at 20% efficiency (bioenergy based geothermal-preheat plant). Annual biogenic CO2 sequestration rates ranged from 217 to 675 tonnes per kg/s with emissions intensities from -131 to -922 gCO2/kWh. By simultaneously boosting low-emissions energy and sequestering biogenic CO2, geothermal-BECCS promises to be an essential technology for meeting climate targets.

负碳地热:地热- beccs能源循环的理论效率和固存潜力
地热系统是低排放强度(平均122克二氧化碳/千瓦时)的基本负荷发电的一个有吸引力的选择。然而,大约70%的地热系统是低焓或中焓(160°C),这往往使它们不经济地开发用于发电。提高这些系统的电力生产和利用效率的一个解决方案是与生物质燃料源混合。在这项工作中,我们介绍并验证了生物质杂交结合在线溶解和回注生物质烟道二氧化碳的概念。这种生物能源和碳捕获与封存(BECCS)的子类,被称为地热BECCS,已经改善了电力生产和负二氧化碳排放。这种利用地热系统发电和作为碳汇的双重方法,在拥有合适地热和生物能源资源的地区可能是一种潜在的脱碳工具。在这里,我们量化了四种地热- beccs配置的热力学和固存性能。高达100%的烟气被溶解,并与废地流体一起重新注入。当地流体产量达到1 kg/s时,闪蒸和二元基准装置分别以6%和8%的效率产生32和43 kWe。相比之下,四种地热- beccs设计在9%效率下产生64千瓦时(闪蒸电厂),76千瓦时(9%效率)(ORC二元电厂),62千瓦时(7%效率)(复合闪蒸二元电厂)和589千瓦时(20%效率)(生物能源地热预热厂)。年生物源二氧化碳固存率为217至675吨/千克/秒,排放强度为-131至-922克/千瓦时。通过同时促进低排放能源和隔离生物二氧化碳,地热beccs有望成为实现气候目标的一项重要技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信