Neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome. Historical introduction.

M Lader
{"title":"Neuroleptic-induced deficit syndrome. Historical introduction.","authors":"M Lader","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The treatment of psychotic illness has long been inextricably associated with society's view in general on social deviance. In medieval times, psychotic individuals were contained within the community, a situation which still prevails in many developing countries. Aggregation of such patients in asylums followed the increasing industrialization of communities in the nineteenth century, when the ability of the disadvantaged of all kinds to survive was greatly jeopardized. The twentieth century has seen a gradual reversal of this process, as attitudes towards mentally ill people have become a little more enlightened and liberal. However, the swing against the great lunatic asylums of the last century has proceeded at such an administrative rate that our patients are again in danger of succumbing medically and economically within our communities. It is common to see desperately poor and damaged psychotic individuals on our streets. The advent of neuroleptics was a major factor in the change from a custodial to an ostensibly rehabilitative approach in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, classic neuroleptics have a long list of well-recognized side effects such as affective and cognitive impairment that lead to poor treatment compliance, psychiatric relapse and social decompensation, the state of affairs of our street psychotics. Treatments that lessen the probability of this unfortunate process are desperately needed. The introduction of new neuroleptic drugs with favourable side effect profiles is to be welcomed as a major step in increasing the quality of life of our patients, both in hospital and functioning in the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":75416,"journal":{"name":"Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"380 ","pages":"6-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The treatment of psychotic illness has long been inextricably associated with society's view in general on social deviance. In medieval times, psychotic individuals were contained within the community, a situation which still prevails in many developing countries. Aggregation of such patients in asylums followed the increasing industrialization of communities in the nineteenth century, when the ability of the disadvantaged of all kinds to survive was greatly jeopardized. The twentieth century has seen a gradual reversal of this process, as attitudes towards mentally ill people have become a little more enlightened and liberal. However, the swing against the great lunatic asylums of the last century has proceeded at such an administrative rate that our patients are again in danger of succumbing medically and economically within our communities. It is common to see desperately poor and damaged psychotic individuals on our streets. The advent of neuroleptics was a major factor in the change from a custodial to an ostensibly rehabilitative approach in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, classic neuroleptics have a long list of well-recognized side effects such as affective and cognitive impairment that lead to poor treatment compliance, psychiatric relapse and social decompensation, the state of affairs of our street psychotics. Treatments that lessen the probability of this unfortunate process are desperately needed. The introduction of new neuroleptic drugs with favourable side effect profiles is to be welcomed as a major step in increasing the quality of life of our patients, both in hospital and functioning in the community.

抗精神病药诱导缺陷综合征。历史介绍。
长期以来,精神疾病的治疗一直与社会对社会越轨行为的普遍看法密不可分。在中世纪,精神病患者被限制在社区内,这种情况在许多发展中国家仍然普遍存在。这类病人聚集在收容所是随着19世纪社区日益工业化而来的,当时各种弱势群体的生存能力受到了极大的损害。20世纪,随着对精神病患者的态度变得更加开明和自由,这一过程逐渐逆转。然而,反对上个世纪的大型疯人院的运动以如此高的行政速度进行,以致我们的病人在我们的社区内再次面临在医疗上和经济上死亡的危险。在我们的街道上看到极度贫穷和受伤的精神病患者是很常见的。精神分裂症的治疗方法从拘留所转为表面上的康复治疗,抗精神病药的出现是其中的一个主要因素。然而,经典的抗精神病药有一长串众所周知的副作用,如情感和认知障碍,导致治疗依从性差,精神复发和社会代偿失代偿,这是我们街头精神病患者的状况。减少这种不幸过程的可能性的治疗是迫切需要的。引进具有良好副作用的新型抗精神病药物是值得欢迎的,这是提高我们的病人在医院和在社区中生活质量的一个重要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信