[Status of the discussion regarding cost-effectiveness of community psychiatry and inpatient psychiatry].

Abstract

In the current climate of escalating health care costs and shrinking resources, higher priority is also being given to the relation between costs and benefits of reform efforts and further developments of existing service delivery systems in the field of mental health. Some proponents of community psychiatry have predicted in a pointed manner that a change in the allocation of resources in favor of community-based care would dramatically decrease the need for hospital beds, cost half as much and be clinically at least as efficacious as inpatient treatment. The author gives careful consideration to these postulates based on today's available literature and on his own experiences in Mannheim and in Bern. He presents an array of newer findings which places them in perspective and to some extent contradicts them as well. Recent studies on the effects of an expansion of outpatient treatment programs on the overall mental health delivery system suggest that in areas with already reasonably developed community services its further enhancement rarely has an effect on the number of admissions to and length of hospital stays. In addition, the postulate that community care is considerably less costly only holds if in- and outpatient facilities are not considered to be integral parts of a comprehensive system of mental health care which both serve different purposes. Accordingly, the question of the effectiveness of treatment must also be discussed very distinctively. Although a network of well-functioning community-based services is (not yet) a veritable alternative, it can by all means, however, serve as a useful counterpart to the intensive treatment offered in modern mental institutions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)