Posttraumatic stress disorder: conceptualization and treatment.

Progress in behavior modification Pub Date : 1996-01-01
P A Boudewyns
{"title":"Posttraumatic stress disorder: conceptualization and treatment.","authors":"P A Boudewyns","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After a long history of both scientific and political debate, the notion that extreme psychological traumatic experiences, in and of themselves, could result in a severe, even malignant, psychiatric disorder is now established. In 1980 posttraumatic stress disorder finally became an officially classified anxiety disorder. Since then, the few controlled treatment outcome studies that have been carried out appear to indicate that the most effective treatment for PTSD is some form of exposure therapy. This is not surprising in light of the fact that several other types of anxiety disorders respond well to this form of behavioral treatment. However, PTSD may be more complex than the other types of anxiety disorders, especially with regard to the variety of symptoms involved. In its chronic form or in combat-related PTSD, no one type of treatment tested so far has been successful in reducing all the symptoms of the disorder. Psychophysiological overarousal to imaginal facsimiles of the traumatic event is especially difficult to influence with treatment. Identifying techniques that reduce or at least control this arousal will likely be grist for the research mill for many years. Theoretical and conceptual formulations regarding both the etiology and treatment of the disorder are in early stages of development. It is hoped that these efforts will eventually mature our understanding of the disorder as researchers explore important issues such as (1) predisposing factors; (2) how the nature and intensity of the stressor relates to the severity of the disorder; and (3) how biological, psychological, social, and cultural variables interact to result in PTSD and to either ameliorate or exacerbate its symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":77598,"journal":{"name":"Progress in behavior modification","volume":"30 ","pages":"165-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in behavior modification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After a long history of both scientific and political debate, the notion that extreme psychological traumatic experiences, in and of themselves, could result in a severe, even malignant, psychiatric disorder is now established. In 1980 posttraumatic stress disorder finally became an officially classified anxiety disorder. Since then, the few controlled treatment outcome studies that have been carried out appear to indicate that the most effective treatment for PTSD is some form of exposure therapy. This is not surprising in light of the fact that several other types of anxiety disorders respond well to this form of behavioral treatment. However, PTSD may be more complex than the other types of anxiety disorders, especially with regard to the variety of symptoms involved. In its chronic form or in combat-related PTSD, no one type of treatment tested so far has been successful in reducing all the symptoms of the disorder. Psychophysiological overarousal to imaginal facsimiles of the traumatic event is especially difficult to influence with treatment. Identifying techniques that reduce or at least control this arousal will likely be grist for the research mill for many years. Theoretical and conceptual formulations regarding both the etiology and treatment of the disorder are in early stages of development. It is hoped that these efforts will eventually mature our understanding of the disorder as researchers explore important issues such as (1) predisposing factors; (2) how the nature and intensity of the stressor relates to the severity of the disorder; and (3) how biological, psychological, social, and cultural variables interact to result in PTSD and to either ameliorate or exacerbate its symptoms.

创伤后应激障碍:概念和治疗。
经过长期的科学和政治辩论,极端的心理创伤经历本身可能导致严重的,甚至是恶性的精神疾病,这一概念现在已经确立。1980年,创伤后应激障碍最终被正式归类为焦虑症。从那以后,进行的少数对照治疗结果研究似乎表明,创伤后应激障碍最有效的治疗方法是某种形式的暴露疗法。考虑到其他几种类型的焦虑症对这种形式的行为治疗反应良好,这并不奇怪。然而,创伤后应激障碍可能比其他类型的焦虑症更复杂,特别是在涉及的各种症状方面。就慢性形式或与战斗有关的创伤后应激障碍而言,迄今为止,没有一种治疗方法能成功地减轻这种疾病的所有症状。心理生理上对创伤事件的想象复制品的过度唤醒尤其难以通过治疗来影响。确定减少或至少控制这种觉醒的技术可能是未来许多年研究的重点。关于这种疾病的病因和治疗的理论和概念表述都处于发展的早期阶段。希望这些努力将最终使我们对这种疾病的理解成熟,因为研究人员探索了一些重要问题,如:(1)易感因素;(2)应激源的性质和强度与障碍严重程度的关系;(3)生物、心理、社会和文化变量如何相互作用导致PTSD,以及如何改善或加剧其症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信