{"title":"Pelvic kidney masquerading as an adnexal mass.","authors":"N R Zusmer, V Maturo, M Stern","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A case of a pelvic kidney diagnosed as an adnexal mass, resulting in surgery, is reported. The employment of ultrasonography in the evaluation of suspected pelvic masses is well established. A number of pathologic conditions can be responsible for a pelvic mass in female patients and consideration of the differential diagnosis of such masses has been well documented. The discrimination of a pathologic pelvic mass from an anatomic variation or unusual location of a normal structure can be, however, a potential source of confusion and erroneous interpretation. This report concerns the unfortunate result of not considering a renal anomaly, i.e. ectopic pelvic kidney, in the differential consideration of a \"pelvic mass\".</p>","PeriodicalId":76463,"journal":{"name":"Revista interamericana de radiologia","volume":"5 3","pages":"95-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista interamericana de radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A case of a pelvic kidney diagnosed as an adnexal mass, resulting in surgery, is reported. The employment of ultrasonography in the evaluation of suspected pelvic masses is well established. A number of pathologic conditions can be responsible for a pelvic mass in female patients and consideration of the differential diagnosis of such masses has been well documented. The discrimination of a pathologic pelvic mass from an anatomic variation or unusual location of a normal structure can be, however, a potential source of confusion and erroneous interpretation. This report concerns the unfortunate result of not considering a renal anomaly, i.e. ectopic pelvic kidney, in the differential consideration of a "pelvic mass".