[Organoleptic properties of a new sweetening agent formulation based on aspartame and xylitol].

P Dumas, F Sauvageot
{"title":"[Organoleptic properties of a new sweetening agent formulation based on aspartame and xylitol].","authors":"P Dumas,&nbsp;F Sauvageot","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In orderto find a new sweetner, different products such as xylitol, aspartame, saccharin, lactose and sucrose are tested by a panel of trained subjects. To determine sweetness intensity, we use the multiple paired comparison technique: each judge tested 9 pairs of samples, in each pair one sample is a sucrose solution at a fixed concentration (20 g/l or 60 g/l) and the other solution is made with a sweetner at a variable concentration, but near the reference. The results are in accordance with the data in the literature. The taste quality is determined with solutions or powders. Experiments are performed with either 10 solutions to identify or 2 unknown powders at the same granulometry. In each case sucrose is compared to a sweetner. The statistical analysis shows that xylitol, levulose and the aspartame-xylitol mixture (25.10(-3) g; 1 g) is tasted identical with sucrose. Studies about stability of the mixture are carried out in sealed ampoules with products at pH between 3 and 7 and temperatures between +4 and +120 degrees C. The results show that the aspartame-xylitol mixture with sweetness intensity equal to 5.0 is a good synthetic sweetner to substitute sucrose.</p>","PeriodicalId":75504,"journal":{"name":"Annales de la nutrition et de l'alimentation","volume":"34 1","pages":"121-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de la nutrition et de l'alimentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In orderto find a new sweetner, different products such as xylitol, aspartame, saccharin, lactose and sucrose are tested by a panel of trained subjects. To determine sweetness intensity, we use the multiple paired comparison technique: each judge tested 9 pairs of samples, in each pair one sample is a sucrose solution at a fixed concentration (20 g/l or 60 g/l) and the other solution is made with a sweetner at a variable concentration, but near the reference. The results are in accordance with the data in the literature. The taste quality is determined with solutions or powders. Experiments are performed with either 10 solutions to identify or 2 unknown powders at the same granulometry. In each case sucrose is compared to a sweetner. The statistical analysis shows that xylitol, levulose and the aspartame-xylitol mixture (25.10(-3) g; 1 g) is tasted identical with sucrose. Studies about stability of the mixture are carried out in sealed ampoules with products at pH between 3 and 7 and temperatures between +4 and +120 degrees C. The results show that the aspartame-xylitol mixture with sweetness intensity equal to 5.0 is a good synthetic sweetner to substitute sucrose.

[基于阿斯巴甜和木糖醇的新型甜味剂配方的感官特性]。
为了找到一种新的甜味剂,一组训练有素的受试者对木糖醇、阿斯巴甜、糖精、乳糖和蔗糖等不同的产品进行了测试。为了确定甜度强度,我们使用了多配对比较技术:每个法官测试9对样品,每对样品中一个样品是固定浓度的蔗糖溶液(20 g/l或60 g/l),另一个溶液是用不同浓度的甜味剂制成的,但接近参考值。结果与文献数据一致。用溶液或粉末来测定味道质量。实验用10种溶液进行鉴定,或用2种未知粉末进行相同粒度测定。在每种情况下,蔗糖都被比作一种甜味剂。统计分析表明,木糖醇、左旋糖和阿斯巴甜-木糖醇混合物(25.10(-3)g;1克)的味道与蔗糖相同。在pH值为3 ~ 7,温度为+4 ~ +120℃的密封安瓿中对混合物的稳定性进行了研究,结果表明,甜度强度为5.0的阿斯巴甜-木糖醇混合物是一种很好的替代蔗糖的合成甜味剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信