Neutralization characteristics of dengue viruses isolated in mosquito cell culture and suckling mouse brain from a case of laboratory dengue infection.

Biken journal Pub Date : 1982-09-01
T Fukunaga, Y Okuno, M Tadano, K Fukai
{"title":"Neutralization characteristics of dengue viruses isolated in mosquito cell culture and suckling mouse brain from a case of laboratory dengue infection.","authors":"T Fukunaga,&nbsp;Y Okuno,&nbsp;M Tadano,&nbsp;K Fukai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the authors (Y.O.) of this paper was accidentally infected in the laboratory with dengue type 4 virus, isolated in Thailand in 1978 using the C6/36 clone of Singh's Aedes albopictus cells (SA). Two strains of the virus were isolated from Y.O.'s serum on the first day of illness using SA and suckling mouse brain (SMB). The SA-isolate and the infecting virus were neutralized with high efficiency by Y.O.'s convalescent sera, but the SMB-isolate was neutralized much less efficiently by the same sera. When the hosts of the isolates were exchanged (SA to SMB, and vice versa), the neutralization efficiencies were reversed. For analysis of this phenomenon, prototype dengue type 4 virus exclusively passed in SMB and the same type of virus passaged 10 times in SA were compared with the initial SA- and SMB-isolates in neutralization tests with sera from patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) obtained in Thailand. The two strains of the prototype virus and the SA-isolate had similar high reactivities, but the SMB-isolate had low reactivity with sera of the DHF patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8767,"journal":{"name":"Biken journal","volume":"25 3","pages":"139-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biken journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the authors (Y.O.) of this paper was accidentally infected in the laboratory with dengue type 4 virus, isolated in Thailand in 1978 using the C6/36 clone of Singh's Aedes albopictus cells (SA). Two strains of the virus were isolated from Y.O.'s serum on the first day of illness using SA and suckling mouse brain (SMB). The SA-isolate and the infecting virus were neutralized with high efficiency by Y.O.'s convalescent sera, but the SMB-isolate was neutralized much less efficiently by the same sera. When the hosts of the isolates were exchanged (SA to SMB, and vice versa), the neutralization efficiencies were reversed. For analysis of this phenomenon, prototype dengue type 4 virus exclusively passed in SMB and the same type of virus passaged 10 times in SA were compared with the initial SA- and SMB-isolates in neutralization tests with sera from patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) obtained in Thailand. The two strains of the prototype virus and the SA-isolate had similar high reactivities, but the SMB-isolate had low reactivity with sera of the DHF patients.

1例实验室登革热感染的蚊细胞培养和乳鼠脑分离的登革热病毒的中和特性。
本文的一名作者(Y.O.)在实验室意外感染了登革热4型病毒,该病毒是1978年在泰国使用Singh氏白纹伊蚊细胞(SA)的C6/36克隆分离出来的。从Y.O.中分离出两株病毒用SA和乳鼠脑(SMB)检测患病第一天的血清。对sa分离物和侵染病毒进行了高效中和但smb -分离株被相同的血清中和的效率要低得多。当分离物的宿主交换时(SA到SMB,反之亦然),中和效率被逆转。为了分析这一现象,在泰国登革热出血热(DHF)患者血清中和试验中,将在SMB中单独通过的登革热4型病毒原型和在SA中传代10次的登革热4型病毒与SA和SMB的初始分离株进行了比较。两株原型病毒和sa分离株对DHF患者血清具有相似的高反应性,而smb分离株对DHF患者血清的反应性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信