Essential hypertension and social coping behavior: experimental findings.

W Linden, M Feuerstein
{"title":"Essential hypertension and social coping behavior: experimental findings.","authors":"W Linden,&nbsp;M Feuerstein","doi":"10.1080/0097840X.1983.9936126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study investigated the hypothesis that mild hypertensives display a distinctive response pattern to interpersonal stress that includes: inadequate social skills, negative cognitive set and cardiovascular hyperreactivity. After completing a set of questionnaires measuring anxiety and cognitive style, subjects monitored interpersonal stress in the natural environment. Following this, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded while subjects interacted with trained role-players in two types of role-play situations: individualized high distress and low distress situations. Hypertensives reported comparable anxiety and were evaluated as equally skilled when compared to normotensives. The cognitive reaction pattern however, discriminated between the groups with hypertensives perceiving less stress and displaying a 'repressive-defensive' cognitive style. Hypertensives displayed a hyperresponse on systolic blood pressure but not on heart rate. With regard to diastolic pressure, controls reacted according to prediction with high distress situations resulting in greater diastolic change than low distress situations. Hypertensives, however, showed the reverse of this pattern with no increase in diastolic pressure during the high distress situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":76006,"journal":{"name":"Journal of human stress","volume":"9 3","pages":"22-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0097840X.1983.9936126","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of human stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1983.9936126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

The present study investigated the hypothesis that mild hypertensives display a distinctive response pattern to interpersonal stress that includes: inadequate social skills, negative cognitive set and cardiovascular hyperreactivity. After completing a set of questionnaires measuring anxiety and cognitive style, subjects monitored interpersonal stress in the natural environment. Following this, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded while subjects interacted with trained role-players in two types of role-play situations: individualized high distress and low distress situations. Hypertensives reported comparable anxiety and were evaluated as equally skilled when compared to normotensives. The cognitive reaction pattern however, discriminated between the groups with hypertensives perceiving less stress and displaying a 'repressive-defensive' cognitive style. Hypertensives displayed a hyperresponse on systolic blood pressure but not on heart rate. With regard to diastolic pressure, controls reacted according to prediction with high distress situations resulting in greater diastolic change than low distress situations. Hypertensives, however, showed the reverse of this pattern with no increase in diastolic pressure during the high distress situations.

原发性高血压与社会应对行为:实验结果。
本研究探讨了轻度高血压患者对人际压力表现出独特的反应模式,包括:社交技能不足、负性认知集和心血管反应性亢进。在完成一套测量焦虑和认知风格的问卷后,受试者在自然环境中监测人际压力。在此之后,当受试者与训练有素的角色扮演者在两种类型的角色扮演情境下互动时,他们的血压和心率被记录下来:个性化的高痛苦情境和低痛苦情境。高血压患者报告了类似的焦虑,并且与正常血压患者相比,被评估为同样熟练。然而,认知反应模式在高血压患者感受到较少压力和表现出“压抑-防御”认知风格的组之间有所区别。高血压患者对收缩压表现出高反应,但对心率没有反应。在舒张压方面,控制组的反应与预测一致,高窘迫状态下的舒张变化比低窘迫状态下的更大。然而,高血压患者表现出相反的模式,在高度窘迫的情况下,舒张压没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信