External quality assessment for clinical microbiological laboratories in Norway 1982. 2. Evaluation of the antibiotic sensitivity test results.

NIPH annals Pub Date : 1983-06-01
P Sandven, J Lassen
{"title":"External quality assessment for clinical microbiological laboratories in Norway 1982. 2. Evaluation of the antibiotic sensitivity test results.","authors":"P Sandven,&nbsp;J Lassen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An external quality assessment for microbiology included antibiotic sensitivity testing of the 24 bacterial strains submitted. The number of antibiotics selected when sensitivity testing bacteria from different sources varied considerably between the laboratories. The discrepancy between actually reported sensitivity groups and the sensitivity groups calculated on the basis of the reported inhibition zones using the recommended regression lines was as great as 7% of a total of 1922 tests. This was mainly due to the use of outdated zone size break-points, indicating that information concerning changing recommendations may be inadequate. Discrepancies between the results reported by the laboratories and the results of a microdilution method giving the minimal inhibitory concentration for six antibiotics were recorded in 18.6% of the tests. Approximately one third of these discrepancies were characterized as \"major\" or \"very major\".</p>","PeriodicalId":76239,"journal":{"name":"NIPH annals","volume":"6 1","pages":"37-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIPH annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An external quality assessment for microbiology included antibiotic sensitivity testing of the 24 bacterial strains submitted. The number of antibiotics selected when sensitivity testing bacteria from different sources varied considerably between the laboratories. The discrepancy between actually reported sensitivity groups and the sensitivity groups calculated on the basis of the reported inhibition zones using the recommended regression lines was as great as 7% of a total of 1922 tests. This was mainly due to the use of outdated zone size break-points, indicating that information concerning changing recommendations may be inadequate. Discrepancies between the results reported by the laboratories and the results of a microdilution method giving the minimal inhibitory concentration for six antibiotics were recorded in 18.6% of the tests. Approximately one third of these discrepancies were characterized as "major" or "very major".

1982年挪威临床微生物实验室的外部质量评价。2. 抗生素敏感性试验结果的评价。
微生物学的外部质量评估包括对提交的24株细菌进行抗生素敏感性测试。不同实验室对不同来源的细菌进行敏感性测试时所选择的抗生素数量差异很大。实际报告的敏感组与使用推荐的回归线根据报告的抑制区计算出的敏感组之间的差异高达1922次试验总数的7%。这主要是由于使用了过时的区域大小断点,表明关于改变建议的信息可能不足。在18.6%的试验中,实验室报告的结果与微量稀释法给出的六种抗生素的最低抑菌浓度的结果存在差异。这些差异中约有三分之一被定性为“重大”或“非常重大”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信