Psychomental stress in tetraplegic man: dissociation in autonomic variables and emotional responsiveness.

E Heidbreder, A Ziegler, K Schafferhans, A Heidland, W Grüninger
{"title":"Psychomental stress in tetraplegic man: dissociation in autonomic variables and emotional responsiveness.","authors":"E Heidbreder,&nbsp;A Ziegler,&nbsp;K Schafferhans,&nbsp;A Heidland,&nbsp;W Grüninger","doi":"10.1080/0097840X.1984.9936054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tetraplegic patients with physiologically complete cervical spinal cord transsection are classic ablation models of sympathetic denervation. Therefore this study was conducted to investigate the hemodynamic response (blood pressure, cardiac rate) and the plasma catecholamine (adrenaline, noradrenaline) release induced by a standardized psychomental stress model (sonic confuser). Attention was focussed on subjective evaluation of stress experience in spinal man. During psychomental stress, typical pressure reaction was not observed, cardiac rate was elevated insignificantly, and catecholamine release was diminished. The subjective estimates of stress experience, however, did not differ from those of the control group. It appears that psychomental stress in sympathectomized man is not extinguished despite abolished peripheral autonomic feedback modifying the state of the central nervous system. Cognitive processes and cortical arousal seem to be the initial and important steps of emotional experience and they are independent from peripheral autonomic processes. These results lend support to the centralistic view of emotions and the importance of cognitive factors in emotional responsiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":76006,"journal":{"name":"Journal of human stress","volume":"10 4","pages":"157-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0097840X.1984.9936054","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of human stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1984.9936054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Tetraplegic patients with physiologically complete cervical spinal cord transsection are classic ablation models of sympathetic denervation. Therefore this study was conducted to investigate the hemodynamic response (blood pressure, cardiac rate) and the plasma catecholamine (adrenaline, noradrenaline) release induced by a standardized psychomental stress model (sonic confuser). Attention was focussed on subjective evaluation of stress experience in spinal man. During psychomental stress, typical pressure reaction was not observed, cardiac rate was elevated insignificantly, and catecholamine release was diminished. The subjective estimates of stress experience, however, did not differ from those of the control group. It appears that psychomental stress in sympathectomized man is not extinguished despite abolished peripheral autonomic feedback modifying the state of the central nervous system. Cognitive processes and cortical arousal seem to be the initial and important steps of emotional experience and they are independent from peripheral autonomic processes. These results lend support to the centralistic view of emotions and the importance of cognitive factors in emotional responsiveness.

四肢瘫痪者的精神压力:自主变量和情绪反应的分离。
生理上完整的颈脊髓横断的四肢瘫痪患者是交感神经去支配的典型消融模型。因此,本研究旨在探讨标准化心理应激模型(音混淆)诱导的血流动力学反应(血压、心率)和血浆儿茶酚胺(肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素)的释放。重点关注脊柱人应激体验的主观评价。在精神应激时,未观察到典型的压力反应,心率不显著升高,儿茶酚胺释放减少。然而,对压力体验的主观估计与对照组没有什么不同。结果表明,尽管周围自主反馈的消失改变了中枢神经系统的状态,但交感神经切除患者的精神压力并未消失。认知过程和皮层觉醒似乎是情绪体验的初始和重要步骤,它们独立于外周自主神经过程。这些结果支持了情绪的中心主义观点以及认知因素在情绪反应中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信