Comparison of the in vitro activity of azlocillin and carbenicillin against 856 clinical bacterial isolates.

NIPH annals Pub Date : 1984-06-01
A G Skar, T Midtvedt, O Dahl
{"title":"Comparison of the in vitro activity of azlocillin and carbenicillin against 856 clinical bacterial isolates.","authors":"A G Skar,&nbsp;T Midtvedt,&nbsp;O Dahl","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eight hundred and fifty-six strains of more than ten species: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, Enterobacter spp, Pseudomonas spp and Acinetobacter spp, were tested by the disc diffusion method against azlocillin and carbenicillin. Azlocillin was found to be superior to carbenicillin against Pseudomonas spp, and more than 90% of the tested strains had minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values well below the serum levels attainable after recommended doses of azlocillin. Against Enterobacteriaceae and Gram-positive cocci, however, azlocillin seemed to have little to offer.</p>","PeriodicalId":76239,"journal":{"name":"NIPH annals","volume":"7 1","pages":"13-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIPH annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eight hundred and fifty-six strains of more than ten species: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, Enterobacter spp, Pseudomonas spp and Acinetobacter spp, were tested by the disc diffusion method against azlocillin and carbenicillin. Azlocillin was found to be superior to carbenicillin against Pseudomonas spp, and more than 90% of the tested strains had minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values well below the serum levels attainable after recommended doses of azlocillin. Against Enterobacteriaceae and Gram-positive cocci, however, azlocillin seemed to have little to offer.

唑洛西林与卡比西林对856株临床分离细菌的体外活性比较。
采用圆盘扩散法检测了金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌、粪链球菌、大肠杆菌、克雷伯氏菌、奇异变形杆菌、寻常变形杆菌、肠杆菌、假单胞菌和不动杆菌等10余种856株菌株对唑洛西林和卡比西林的耐药性。研究发现,在抗假单胞菌方面,唑洛西林优于卡比西林,超过90%的测试菌株的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值远低于推荐剂量的唑洛西林后可达到的血清水平。然而,对于肠杆菌科和革兰氏阳性球菌,唑洛西林似乎没有什么作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信