Clinical and experimental methods for the determination of cholesterol absorption.

J C Gibson
{"title":"Clinical and experimental methods for the determination of cholesterol absorption.","authors":"J C Gibson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The following section summarizes this methodological treatment of cholesterol absorption by considering the advantages and disadvantages of the available methods. As outlined in Table 6, there are certain technical and interpretational disadvantages to all methods which should be weighed in deciding the appropriate method to use for a given experimental protocol. Direct methods are virtually the only ones capable of measuring the total flux of cholesterol between intestinal lumen and lymph. All the other methods allow interpretations relating only to the flux of exogenous cholesterol. On the other hand, the direct methods are invasive--involving surgery--in the case of experimental animals, and intubation, in the case of intestinal perfusion. This could potentially lead to unnatural conditions for the absorptive surface of the gut. Direct methods, balance methods, and the isotopic equilibrium method all measure a mass of cholesterol transferred. Method IV, the plasma isotope ratio method, and the continuous feeding method, on the other hand, only provide an estimate of the percent of an administered dose absorbed, although this can be converted to a mass estimate with an accurate knowledge of intake. The balance methods, continuous feeding, and isotopic equilibrium method all provide an estimate of absorption over time. The plasma isotope ratio method and method IV, however, rely on repeated measurements to measure fluctuations in absorption. In their favor, method IV and the isotope ratio technique have several advantages that make them the methods of choice for human and large-scale animal studies. These are simplicity, low isotope dosage, and the fact that they are readily done on an outpatient basis. In general, then, direct or balance methods are preferable for precise studies where absolute levels of absorbed cholesterol and fluctuations over time need to be assessed. Direct methods certainly provide the greatest interpretational flexibility in this regard by measuring endogenous and exogenous flux. Among balance methods, method II may be the most precise, but method I is the easiest to perform technically, may be used on an outpatient basis, and requires lower isotope dosage. For evaluating differences in percent cholesterol absorption in man and in all animals except the rabbit, the plasma isotope ratio technique is technically the easiest method both for the investigator and the subject. It also appears to compare very favorably with the more tedious balance methods and will undoubtedly be used in more and more experimental studies of cholesterol absorption.</p>","PeriodicalId":79229,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory and research methods in biology and medicine","volume":"10 ","pages":"157-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory and research methods in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following section summarizes this methodological treatment of cholesterol absorption by considering the advantages and disadvantages of the available methods. As outlined in Table 6, there are certain technical and interpretational disadvantages to all methods which should be weighed in deciding the appropriate method to use for a given experimental protocol. Direct methods are virtually the only ones capable of measuring the total flux of cholesterol between intestinal lumen and lymph. All the other methods allow interpretations relating only to the flux of exogenous cholesterol. On the other hand, the direct methods are invasive--involving surgery--in the case of experimental animals, and intubation, in the case of intestinal perfusion. This could potentially lead to unnatural conditions for the absorptive surface of the gut. Direct methods, balance methods, and the isotopic equilibrium method all measure a mass of cholesterol transferred. Method IV, the plasma isotope ratio method, and the continuous feeding method, on the other hand, only provide an estimate of the percent of an administered dose absorbed, although this can be converted to a mass estimate with an accurate knowledge of intake. The balance methods, continuous feeding, and isotopic equilibrium method all provide an estimate of absorption over time. The plasma isotope ratio method and method IV, however, rely on repeated measurements to measure fluctuations in absorption. In their favor, method IV and the isotope ratio technique have several advantages that make them the methods of choice for human and large-scale animal studies. These are simplicity, low isotope dosage, and the fact that they are readily done on an outpatient basis. In general, then, direct or balance methods are preferable for precise studies where absolute levels of absorbed cholesterol and fluctuations over time need to be assessed. Direct methods certainly provide the greatest interpretational flexibility in this regard by measuring endogenous and exogenous flux. Among balance methods, method II may be the most precise, but method I is the easiest to perform technically, may be used on an outpatient basis, and requires lower isotope dosage. For evaluating differences in percent cholesterol absorption in man and in all animals except the rabbit, the plasma isotope ratio technique is technically the easiest method both for the investigator and the subject. It also appears to compare very favorably with the more tedious balance methods and will undoubtedly be used in more and more experimental studies of cholesterol absorption.

测定胆固醇吸收的临床和实验方法。
以下部分通过考虑现有方法的优点和缺点,总结了这种胆固醇吸收的方法学治疗。如表6所述,所有方法都有一定的技术和解释上的缺点,在决定为给定的实验方案使用适当的方法时应加以权衡。直接方法实际上是唯一能够测量肠腔和淋巴之间胆固醇总通量的方法。所有其他方法都只允许解释外源性胆固醇的通量。另一方面,直接的方法是侵入性的——在实验动物的情况下涉及手术,在肠灌注的情况下涉及插管。这可能会导致肠道吸收表面出现不自然的状况。直接法、平衡法和同位素平衡法都测量转移的胆固醇质量。另一方面,方法四,血浆同位素比值法和连续喂养法,只能提供给药剂量吸收百分比的估计值,尽管这可以通过准确的摄入知识转换为质量估计值。平衡法、连续进料法和同位素平衡法都提供了随时间的吸收估计。然而,等离子体同位素比值法和方法四依靠重复测量来测量吸收波动。方法IV和同位素比值技术有几个优点,使它们成为人类和大规模动物研究的首选方法。这些方法简单,同位素剂量低,而且在门诊病人中很容易完成。一般来说,在需要评估吸收胆固醇的绝对水平及其随时间波动的精确研究中,直接或平衡方法是可取的。通过测量内源性和外源性通量,直接方法在这方面无疑提供了最大的解释灵活性。在平衡方法中,方法II可能是最精确的,但方法I在技术上是最容易执行的,可以在门诊使用,并且需要较低的同位素剂量。为了评估人类和除兔子以外的所有动物的胆固醇吸收百分比的差异,血浆同位素比值技术对研究者和受试者来说都是技术上最简单的方法。与比较繁琐的平衡方法相比,它似乎也非常有利,毫无疑问,它将越来越多地用于胆固醇吸收的实验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信