Preferences for core microbiome composition and function by different definition methods: Evidence for the core microbiome of Eucommia ulmoides bark

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Chunbo Dong , Qiuyu Shao , Qingqing Zhang , Ting Yao , Jianzhong Huang , Zongqi Liang , Yanfeng Han
{"title":"Preferences for core microbiome composition and function by different definition methods: Evidence for the core microbiome of Eucommia ulmoides bark","authors":"Chunbo Dong ,&nbsp;Qiuyu Shao ,&nbsp;Qingqing Zhang ,&nbsp;Ting Yao ,&nbsp;Jianzhong Huang ,&nbsp;Zongqi Liang ,&nbsp;Yanfeng Han","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The core microbiome, as a unique group of microorganisms, is an emerging research hotspot that provides a new opportunity to improve growth and production of a host. However, the subjectivity associated with the concept of “core microbiome” means there is currently no uniform definition method for the core microbiome. In this study, the strengths and limitations of four commonly used definition methods for the core microbiome were explored from composition to function based on the 16S rRNA gene dataset of <em>Eucommia ulmoides</em> bark from 25 different biogeographical regions in China. There were differences in the composition of the core microbiomes defined by the different methods. The four definition methods of phylogeny, membership, composition, and network connection contained 274, 10, 5, and 5 core OTUs (operational taxonomic units), respectively. In contrast, the core microbiomes defined by different methods displayed similarities in function. In addition, different definition methods showed varying preferences for abundant taxa, intermediate taxa, and rare taxa. Some core taxa defined by the definition method of phylogeny were significantly associated with pharmacologically active ingredients of <em>E. ulmoides</em> bark. The findings of this study suggest that although the core microbiomes defined by different methods have preferences in composition and function, the term refers to a group of microbes that are particularly notable and important for host-associated microbiomes. Therefore, we propose: (I) The definition method of the core microbiome should be selected according to the ecological problems faced; (II) A combination of multiple methods may comprehensively reveal the core microbiome at different levels of the host, and may also facilitate understanding of the ecological and evolutionary processes that govern host-microbe interactions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"790 ","pages":"Article 148091"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148091","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721031624","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The core microbiome, as a unique group of microorganisms, is an emerging research hotspot that provides a new opportunity to improve growth and production of a host. However, the subjectivity associated with the concept of “core microbiome” means there is currently no uniform definition method for the core microbiome. In this study, the strengths and limitations of four commonly used definition methods for the core microbiome were explored from composition to function based on the 16S rRNA gene dataset of Eucommia ulmoides bark from 25 different biogeographical regions in China. There were differences in the composition of the core microbiomes defined by the different methods. The four definition methods of phylogeny, membership, composition, and network connection contained 274, 10, 5, and 5 core OTUs (operational taxonomic units), respectively. In contrast, the core microbiomes defined by different methods displayed similarities in function. In addition, different definition methods showed varying preferences for abundant taxa, intermediate taxa, and rare taxa. Some core taxa defined by the definition method of phylogeny were significantly associated with pharmacologically active ingredients of E. ulmoides bark. The findings of this study suggest that although the core microbiomes defined by different methods have preferences in composition and function, the term refers to a group of microbes that are particularly notable and important for host-associated microbiomes. Therefore, we propose: (I) The definition method of the core microbiome should be selected according to the ecological problems faced; (II) A combination of multiple methods may comprehensively reveal the core microbiome at different levels of the host, and may also facilitate understanding of the ecological and evolutionary processes that govern host-microbe interactions.

Abstract Image

不同定义方法对核心微生物组组成和功能的偏好:杜仲树皮核心微生物组的证据
核心微生物组作为一种独特的微生物群,是一个新兴的研究热点,为促进宿主的生长和生产提供了新的机会。然而,由于“核心微生物组”概念的主观性,导致目前对核心微生物组没有统一的定义方法。本研究基于中国25个不同生物地理区域杜仲树皮16S rRNA基因数据集,从组成到功能,探讨了4种常用的核心微生物组定义方法的优势与局限性。不同方法定义的核心微生物组组成存在差异。系统发育、隶属度、组成和网络连接4种定义方法分别包含274个、10个、5个和5个核心otu (operational taxonomic units)。相比之下,不同方法定义的核心微生物组在功能上表现出相似性。此外,不同的定义方法对丰富分类群、中间分类群和稀有分类群的偏好也不同。系统发育定义方法确定的一些核心分类群与杜仲树皮的药理活性成分有显著相关性。本研究结果表明,尽管不同方法定义的核心微生物组在组成和功能上有不同的偏好,但该术语指的是一组对宿主相关微生物组特别显著和重要的微生物。因此,我们提出:(1)核心微生物组的定义方法应根据所面临的生态问题进行选择;(II)多种方法的结合可以全面揭示宿主不同水平的核心微生物组,也可以促进对宿主-微生物相互作用的生态和进化过程的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信