Comparison of urine cytology versus fine needle aspiration cytology in monitoring renal allograft dysfunction.

B Spohn, H Bauer, E Gmähle, R Guth, H E Franz
{"title":"Comparison of urine cytology versus fine needle aspiration cytology in monitoring renal allograft dysfunction.","authors":"B Spohn,&nbsp;H Bauer,&nbsp;E Gmähle,&nbsp;R Guth,&nbsp;H E Franz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In renal allograft monitoring we performed daily urine cytology (UC) (n = 773) and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) (n = 144) two to three times weekly in 29 allograft recipients with 18 acute rejection episodes. UC is more accurate in diagnosis and therapeutic control of acute rejection episodes. In addition UC is better than FNAC in revealing non-rejection causes of graft dysfunction such as interstitial nephritis (pyelonephritis, allergic nephritis), the presence of bacteria, fungi and virus inclusion bearing cells in the sediment and nephrotoxic tubular damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":76354,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association. European Dialysis and Transplant Association","volume":"19 ","pages":"495-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association. European Dialysis and Transplant Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In renal allograft monitoring we performed daily urine cytology (UC) (n = 773) and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) (n = 144) two to three times weekly in 29 allograft recipients with 18 acute rejection episodes. UC is more accurate in diagnosis and therapeutic control of acute rejection episodes. In addition UC is better than FNAC in revealing non-rejection causes of graft dysfunction such as interstitial nephritis (pyelonephritis, allergic nephritis), the presence of bacteria, fungi and virus inclusion bearing cells in the sediment and nephrotoxic tubular damage.

尿细胞学与细针穿刺细胞学监测同种异体肾移植功能障碍的比较。
在肾移植监测方面,我们对29例有18次急性排斥反应的同种异体移植受者进行了每日尿细胞学检查(UC) (n = 773)和细针吸细胞学检查(FNAC) (n = 144),每周2 - 3次。UC对急性排斥反应的诊断和治疗控制更为准确。此外,UC比FNAC更能揭示移植物功能障碍的非排斥原因,如间质性肾炎(肾盂肾炎、过敏性肾炎)、沉积物中携带细菌、真菌和病毒包涵体细胞的存在以及肾毒性小管损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书