Experimental determination of surface energy for high-energy surface: A review

IF 15.9 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Shirong Zhu , Kaibin Xie , Qiaoli Lin , Rui Cao , Feng Qiu
{"title":"Experimental determination of surface energy for high-energy surface: A review","authors":"Shirong Zhu ,&nbsp;Kaibin Xie ,&nbsp;Qiaoli Lin ,&nbsp;Rui Cao ,&nbsp;Feng Qiu","doi":"10.1016/j.cis.2023.102905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The experimental determination of surface free energy is of great importance for engineering applications. However, there is no universal, reliable, and convenient measurement means to achieve experimental determination of </span>solid surface energy for high-energy surface. In this work, the existing techniques for experimental determination of surface energy of solids, including indirect (4 kinds) and direct methods (3 kinds), were critically reviewed. In the indirect methods: the explicit interfacial bonding characteristics are required for the multiphase equilibrium technique and for the </span>determination method from crystal equilibrium shape; the critical surface energy technique does not satisfy Zisman's hypothesis that the solid-liquid interface tension is zero (or close to zero), and the parameters fitted by empirical equations cannot have definite physical meaning; the derivation based on the surface tension in the liquid state can only obtain the surface energy of the solid phase near the melting point, and is limited to the prediction of the surface energy of elemental metal. Among the direct determination methods, except for the zero-creep method, are based on generalized determination technologies. All determined results are strongly influenced by the accuracy of the particle (grain) size, scale effect, the atmosphere, etc. This leads to the fact that the errors are still huge regardless of the determination method used, and it is difficult to achieve uniformity of the data. All methods rely to some extent on specific assumptions or theoretical models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":239,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Colloid and Interface Science","volume":"315 ","pages":"Article 102905"},"PeriodicalIF":15.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Colloid and Interface Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001868623000726","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The experimental determination of surface free energy is of great importance for engineering applications. However, there is no universal, reliable, and convenient measurement means to achieve experimental determination of solid surface energy for high-energy surface. In this work, the existing techniques for experimental determination of surface energy of solids, including indirect (4 kinds) and direct methods (3 kinds), were critically reviewed. In the indirect methods: the explicit interfacial bonding characteristics are required for the multiphase equilibrium technique and for the determination method from crystal equilibrium shape; the critical surface energy technique does not satisfy Zisman's hypothesis that the solid-liquid interface tension is zero (or close to zero), and the parameters fitted by empirical equations cannot have definite physical meaning; the derivation based on the surface tension in the liquid state can only obtain the surface energy of the solid phase near the melting point, and is limited to the prediction of the surface energy of elemental metal. Among the direct determination methods, except for the zero-creep method, are based on generalized determination technologies. All determined results are strongly influenced by the accuracy of the particle (grain) size, scale effect, the atmosphere, etc. This leads to the fact that the errors are still huge regardless of the determination method used, and it is difficult to achieve uniformity of the data. All methods rely to some extent on specific assumptions or theoretical models.

Abstract Image

高能表面表面能的实验测定综述
表面自由能的实验测定对工程应用具有重要意义。然而,目前还没有一种通用、可靠、方便的测量手段来实现高能表面固体表面能的实验测定。本文综述了现有的固体表面能实验测定方法,包括间接法(4种)和直接法(3种)。在间接方法中:多相平衡技术和晶体平衡形状测定方法需要明确的界面键合特性;临界表面能技术不满足Zisman关于固液界面张力为零(或接近于零)的假设,经验方程拟合的参数不能具有确定的物理意义;基于液态表面张力的推导只能得到熔点附近固相的表面能,仅限于对元素金属表面能的预测。在直接测定方法中,除零蠕变法外,均基于广义测定技术。所有确定的结果都受到颗粒(颗粒)尺寸的准确性、尺度效应、大气等的强烈影响。这导致无论采用何种测定方法,误差仍然很大,难以实现数据的均匀性。所有的方法都在一定程度上依赖于特定的假设或理论模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
28.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
175
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: "Advances in Colloid and Interface Science" is an international journal that focuses on experimental and theoretical developments in interfacial and colloidal phenomena. The journal covers a wide range of disciplines including biology, chemistry, physics, and technology. The journal accepts review articles on any topic within the scope of colloid and interface science. These articles should provide an in-depth analysis of the subject matter, offering a critical review of the current state of the field. The author's informed opinion on the topic should also be included. The manuscript should compare and contrast ideas found in the reviewed literature and address the limitations of these ideas. Typically, the articles published in this journal are written by recognized experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信