Modeles et pragmatique, activation et repetition: Reflexions sur la causalite de la maladie chez les Senoufo de Cote D'ivoire

Nicole Sindzingre, Andras Zempléni
{"title":"Modeles et pragmatique, activation et repetition: Reflexions sur la causalite de la maladie chez les Senoufo de Cote D'ivoire","authors":"Nicole Sindzingre,&nbsp;Andras Zempléni","doi":"10.1016/0160-7987(81)90053-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The distinction between <em>a priori</em> and <em>a posteriori</em> causality is a necessary methodological pre-condition for the analysis of explanatory assertions about sickness. Part one, on <em>a priori</em> causality, will not undertake a somewhat absurd reconstruction of a Senoufo medical ‘taxonomy’, it will rather describe the formal types of connections, necessary or possible, between a symptom and the three elements of its causal configuration: cause, agent, and origin. It is to be emphasized that there is a great heterogeneity between the logic of <em>a priori</em> ‘codes’ and pragmatic <em>a posteriori</em> elaborations. What is the reason for such a heterogeneity?</p><p>The second section shows that Senoufo therapeutic behaviours and institutions function in a closed and autonomous manner in relation to the interpretive register: the introduction of new therapeutic alternatives (notably Islamic or biomédical) do not necessarily lead to a change in causal thought. Furthermore R. Horton's conception of cause switching in West African medical thought must be criticized because of the inadequacy of the related notion of ‘remedial prescription’ and his lack of distinction between cause, agent, and origin.</p><p>Finally, an effort is made to separate out the principle of coherence which accounts as much for the diversity of <em>a priori</em> explanatory models and observed divinatory and therapeutic practices, as for the closure of the etiological field in relation to external systems. The analysis of the complex institution of sãdoho leads to the conclusion that: (1) the sickness event is conceived as the reactivation of an earlier event; it is immediately reinserted and stored in the collective memory of the matrilineage: (2) the divinatory device has the function of feeding this memory with its proper constituent instances and recollections: (3) initiation to sãdoho, which reactualizes and transfers all previously registered and stored sickness etiologies upon a potential diviner of the matrilineage, illustrates the general conception of causality based on the principle of repetition. This permits an understanding of several (taits peculiar to the medical pluralism of the Senoufo.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79261,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 279-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-7987(81)90053-3","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160798781900533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The distinction between a priori and a posteriori causality is a necessary methodological pre-condition for the analysis of explanatory assertions about sickness. Part one, on a priori causality, will not undertake a somewhat absurd reconstruction of a Senoufo medical ‘taxonomy’, it will rather describe the formal types of connections, necessary or possible, between a symptom and the three elements of its causal configuration: cause, agent, and origin. It is to be emphasized that there is a great heterogeneity between the logic of a priori ‘codes’ and pragmatic a posteriori elaborations. What is the reason for such a heterogeneity?

The second section shows that Senoufo therapeutic behaviours and institutions function in a closed and autonomous manner in relation to the interpretive register: the introduction of new therapeutic alternatives (notably Islamic or biomédical) do not necessarily lead to a change in causal thought. Furthermore R. Horton's conception of cause switching in West African medical thought must be criticized because of the inadequacy of the related notion of ‘remedial prescription’ and his lack of distinction between cause, agent, and origin.

Finally, an effort is made to separate out the principle of coherence which accounts as much for the diversity of a priori explanatory models and observed divinatory and therapeutic practices, as for the closure of the etiological field in relation to external systems. The analysis of the complex institution of sãdoho leads to the conclusion that: (1) the sickness event is conceived as the reactivation of an earlier event; it is immediately reinserted and stored in the collective memory of the matrilineage: (2) the divinatory device has the function of feeding this memory with its proper constituent instances and recollections: (3) initiation to sãdoho, which reactualizes and transfers all previously registered and stored sickness etiologies upon a potential diviner of the matrilineage, illustrates the general conception of causality based on the principle of repetition. This permits an understanding of several (taits peculiar to the medical pluralism of the Senoufo.

模型与实用主义、激活与重复:对科特迪瓦塞努福人疾病因果关系的反思
先验因果关系和后验因果关系之间的区别是分析关于疾病的解释性断言的必要方法论前提。第一部分,关于先验的因果关系,不会对Senoufo医学“分类法”进行某种荒谬的重建,而是将描述症状与其因果结构的三个要素(原因,动因和起源)之间必要或可能的联系的形式类型。需要强调的是,在先验的“代码”逻辑和事后的语用解释之间存在着巨大的异质性。造成这种异质性的原因是什么?第二部分表明,Senoufo治疗行为和机构以一种封闭和自主的方式运作,与解释登记册有关:引入新的治疗方案(特别是伊斯兰或生物医学)并不一定会导致因果思想的改变。此外,R. Horton关于西非医学思想中原因转换的概念必须受到批评,因为“补救处方”的相关概念不充分,而且他缺乏对原因、代理和起源的区分。最后,努力分离出一致性原则,这一原则解释了先验解释模型和观察到的占卜和治疗实践的多样性,以及与外部系统相关的病因学领域的封闭。通过分析 doho的复杂制度,得出以下结论:(1)疾病事件被认为是先前事件的再激活;它立即被重新插入并存储在母系的集体记忆中:(2)占卜装置具有用其适当的组成实例和回忆来喂养这一记忆的功能;(3)对s doho的启蒙,它重新实现并转移所有先前记录和存储的疾病病因,在母系的潜在占卜者身上,说明了基于重复原则的因果关系的一般概念。这使我们能够理解塞努福人的医学多元性所特有的几个特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信