Efficiency of conventional versus marker technique for shortening the time in digestion trials.

E A Khafagi, Y I El-Talty, M S Samy
{"title":"Efficiency of conventional versus marker technique for shortening the time in digestion trials.","authors":"E A Khafagi,&nbsp;Y I El-Talty,&nbsp;M S Samy","doi":"10.1007/BF02021563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Investigation was carried out to determine the digestibility of the main nutrients (DM, CP and energy) in digestion trials using some roughages in order to reduce the collection period and to study the suitable time of the marker technique and its application. This study revealed the following results: (1) The average recovery of chromic oxide in feces were 99.71 +/- 3.75% in the 3rd day (after administrating the marker), 95.17 +/- 1.03% in the 5th day and 96.53 +/- 2.35% in the 7th day. It could be concluded that this marker is indigestible and could be used as an ideal one. (2) There were no significant differences between the digestibility values with the conventional method and those of the two short-period techniques (the first three days and the first five days collection periods). The percentage differences were not exceeding 6% except some deviations with CP digestibility in one trial (hay : rice straw mixture). These two methods seemed to be reliable in practice. (3) The same differences were found between the digestion coefficients, which conducted from the conventional method, and those of the marker technique using three times for collection except high deviations were found with one trial in the last two procedures. Using marker technique appeared promising from the 3rd day up to the 7th day after its administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":76841,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Ernahrungswissenschaft. Journal of nutritional sciences. Supplementa","volume":"20 3","pages":"182-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02021563","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Ernahrungswissenschaft. Journal of nutritional sciences. Supplementa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02021563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Investigation was carried out to determine the digestibility of the main nutrients (DM, CP and energy) in digestion trials using some roughages in order to reduce the collection period and to study the suitable time of the marker technique and its application. This study revealed the following results: (1) The average recovery of chromic oxide in feces were 99.71 +/- 3.75% in the 3rd day (after administrating the marker), 95.17 +/- 1.03% in the 5th day and 96.53 +/- 2.35% in the 7th day. It could be concluded that this marker is indigestible and could be used as an ideal one. (2) There were no significant differences between the digestibility values with the conventional method and those of the two short-period techniques (the first three days and the first five days collection periods). The percentage differences were not exceeding 6% except some deviations with CP digestibility in one trial (hay : rice straw mixture). These two methods seemed to be reliable in practice. (3) The same differences were found between the digestion coefficients, which conducted from the conventional method, and those of the marker technique using three times for collection except high deviations were found with one trial in the last two procedures. Using marker technique appeared promising from the 3rd day up to the 7th day after its administration.

传统技术与标记技术缩短消化试验时间的比较。
为缩短收集时间,研究标记技术的适用时间及其应用,对部分粗饲料消化试验中主要营养物质(干物质、粗蛋白质和能量)的消化率进行了测定。结果表明:(1)给药后第3天粪便中氧化铬的平均回收率为99.71 +/- 3.75%,第5天为95.17 +/- 1.03%,第7天为96.53 +/- 2.35%。结果表明,该标记物不易消化,可作为一种理想的标记物。(2)常规方法的消化率与两种短周期技术(采集期前3 d和前5 d)的消化率无显著差异。除1个试验(干草与稻草混合)粗蛋白质消化率有一定偏差外,差异均不超过6%。这两种方法在实践中似乎是可靠的。(3)常规法测定的消解系数与标记法测定的消解系数相差不大,但后两次测定的消解系数相差较大。标记技术在给药后第3天至第7天表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信