Healing and cultural transformation: The Tswana of Southern Africa [1]

Jean Comaroff
{"title":"Healing and cultural transformation: The Tswana of Southern Africa [1]","authors":"Jean Comaroff","doi":"10.1016/0160-7987(81)90062-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This essay calls into doubt the quest for ‘theoretical closure’ in the study of African systems of healing. The notion of ‘theoretical closure’ may be understood in two ways, one empirically derived and the other epistemological. The first is based on the assumption that ‘medical systems’ form a natural and discrete empirical domain, a view ultimately grounded in arbitrary or ethnocentric analytical criteria. The second sees such medical systems as parts of ahistorical and closed social systems. Both serve to render medical anthropology parochial in relation to the mainstream discipline and unable to seize the potential offered by the study of healing to illuminate important general problems, such as the articulation of thought and action, of individual experience and cultural form, and of structural order and historical process.</p><p>The study of healing in societies which have relatively recently been incorporated into world systems raises the urgent need to devise models which permit the examination of socio-cultural orders in time how they are both reproduced and transformed. This can no longer legitimately be viewed as the ‘opening’ of ‘closed’ systems: rather, it requires understanding how the dynamic processes of particular small-scale societies engage with encompassing politico-economic forces. Healing is crucially bound up with this, for its knowledge and practice give form to key conceptions and values in all cultures, and play upon the identity of physical and social being. The context of affliction is an important locus both for the reinforcement and the reformulation of socio-cultural categories.</p><p>The case of the Tswana of Southern Africa is employed to suggest how a focus upon healing systems in time is entailed in the study of wider processes of perpetuation and change. It is the interrelationship of these processes in particular socio-cultural and temporal contexts which is the key to understanding both systems of healing and systems in general.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79261,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 367-378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-7987(81)90062-4","citationCount":"67","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160798781900624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

Abstract

This essay calls into doubt the quest for ‘theoretical closure’ in the study of African systems of healing. The notion of ‘theoretical closure’ may be understood in two ways, one empirically derived and the other epistemological. The first is based on the assumption that ‘medical systems’ form a natural and discrete empirical domain, a view ultimately grounded in arbitrary or ethnocentric analytical criteria. The second sees such medical systems as parts of ahistorical and closed social systems. Both serve to render medical anthropology parochial in relation to the mainstream discipline and unable to seize the potential offered by the study of healing to illuminate important general problems, such as the articulation of thought and action, of individual experience and cultural form, and of structural order and historical process.

The study of healing in societies which have relatively recently been incorporated into world systems raises the urgent need to devise models which permit the examination of socio-cultural orders in time how they are both reproduced and transformed. This can no longer legitimately be viewed as the ‘opening’ of ‘closed’ systems: rather, it requires understanding how the dynamic processes of particular small-scale societies engage with encompassing politico-economic forces. Healing is crucially bound up with this, for its knowledge and practice give form to key conceptions and values in all cultures, and play upon the identity of physical and social being. The context of affliction is an important locus both for the reinforcement and the reformulation of socio-cultural categories.

The case of the Tswana of Southern Africa is employed to suggest how a focus upon healing systems in time is entailed in the study of wider processes of perpetuation and change. It is the interrelationship of these processes in particular socio-cultural and temporal contexts which is the key to understanding both systems of healing and systems in general.

治愈与文化转型:南非的茨瓦纳人[1]
这篇文章质疑了在非洲治疗系统研究中对“理论终结”的追求。“理论封闭”的概念可以通过两种方式理解,一种是经验推导的,另一种是认识论的。第一种是基于“医疗系统”形成一个自然和离散的经验领域的假设,这种观点最终基于武断或以种族为中心的分析标准。第二种观点认为这样的医疗系统是非历史的、封闭的社会系统的一部分。两者都使医学人类学相对于主流学科显得狭隘,无法抓住治疗研究所提供的潜力来阐明重要的一般性问题,例如思想和行动的衔接、个人经验和文化形式、结构秩序和历史进程。对最近才被纳入世界体系的社会的康复研究提出了迫切需要设计模型,以便及时检查社会文化秩序是如何再生产和转变的。这不能再被合理地视为“封闭”系统的“开放”:相反,它需要理解特定小规模社会的动态过程如何与包括政治经济力量相结合。治疗与此密切相关,因为它的知识和实践为所有文化中的关键概念和价值观提供了形式,并发挥了身体和社会存在的身份。苦难的背景是加强和重新制定社会文化类别的重要场所。本文以南部非洲茨瓦纳人的情况为例,说明在研究更广泛的永续和变化过程时,如何把重点放在及时治疗系统上。在特定的社会文化和时间背景下,这些过程的相互关系是理解治疗系统和一般系统的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信