Alternative therapeutic systems in belize: A semiotic framework

Kathryn V. Staiano
{"title":"Alternative therapeutic systems in belize: A semiotic framework","authors":"Kathryn V. Staiano","doi":"10.1016/0160-7987(81)90056-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The first part of this paper presents data on the socio-medical system of an ethnically heterogeneous society collected during 16 months of fieldwork. Special attention is given to the Black Caribs (or Garifuna). The focus is on the possible functions of alternative therapeutic systems. The second half of the paper provides a semiotic framework for the analysis of illness episodes. It is concluded that the sign of disorder in this context has no single interpretant. Rather, there exist a variety of interpretants from which the therapist and patient may select. There are constraints on this process, but the process is enhanced where the patient (and the social group) are free to negotiate a ‘diagnosis’. Negotiation implies selecting from among a variety of potential meanings: it implies a dialogue in which one goal is an interpretation which is acceptable in cultural terms and which leads to a therapy which is perceived as ‘appropriate’. Negotiation may also mean the realignment of signs into new ‘syndromes’ which indicate different etiologies or therapies. The existence of alternative therapeutic systems facilitates this process by providing access to new codes governing interpretation. The confrontation with biomedicine and its largely intractable codes may require that the ensuing interpretation incorporate, account for, or partially assimilate the ‘diagnosis’ or interpretation of biomedical personnel. Nevertheless, a single sign may have multiple referents, each consistent with one of the various interpretations imposed by multiple therapeutic systems. These referents may exist simultaneously without inherent contradiction. But to achieve such a consensus may require the development of new models based on an articulation but not an identification of two or more codes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79261,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 317-332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-7987(81)90056-9","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160798781900569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

The first part of this paper presents data on the socio-medical system of an ethnically heterogeneous society collected during 16 months of fieldwork. Special attention is given to the Black Caribs (or Garifuna). The focus is on the possible functions of alternative therapeutic systems. The second half of the paper provides a semiotic framework for the analysis of illness episodes. It is concluded that the sign of disorder in this context has no single interpretant. Rather, there exist a variety of interpretants from which the therapist and patient may select. There are constraints on this process, but the process is enhanced where the patient (and the social group) are free to negotiate a ‘diagnosis’. Negotiation implies selecting from among a variety of potential meanings: it implies a dialogue in which one goal is an interpretation which is acceptable in cultural terms and which leads to a therapy which is perceived as ‘appropriate’. Negotiation may also mean the realignment of signs into new ‘syndromes’ which indicate different etiologies or therapies. The existence of alternative therapeutic systems facilitates this process by providing access to new codes governing interpretation. The confrontation with biomedicine and its largely intractable codes may require that the ensuing interpretation incorporate, account for, or partially assimilate the ‘diagnosis’ or interpretation of biomedical personnel. Nevertheless, a single sign may have multiple referents, each consistent with one of the various interpretations imposed by multiple therapeutic systems. These referents may exist simultaneously without inherent contradiction. But to achieve such a consensus may require the development of new models based on an articulation but not an identification of two or more codes.

伯利兹的替代治疗系统:符号学框架
本文的第一部分介绍了在16个月的田野调查中收集的一个种族异质社会的社会医疗系统数据。特别注意的是黑加勒比人(或加里富纳人)。重点是替代治疗系统的可能功能。论文的后半部分为疾病发作的分析提供了符号学框架。结论是,在这种情况下,紊乱的迹象没有单一的解释。相反,存在着各种各样的解释者,治疗师和患者可以从中选择。这一过程有一些限制,但在患者(和社会群体)可以自由协商“诊断”的情况下,这一过程得到了加强。谈判意味着从多种潜在意义中进行选择:它意味着一种对话,其中一个目标是在文化术语中可接受的解释,并导致被认为是“适当的”治疗。协商也可能意味着将体征重新调整为新的“综合征”,表明不同的病因或治疗方法。替代治疗系统的存在通过提供新的规范解释的途径,促进了这一过程。与生物医学及其大部分难以处理的代码的对抗可能要求随后的解释包含、解释或部分吸收生物医学人员的“诊断”或解释。然而,一个单一的符号可能有多个参照物,每个参照物与多个治疗系统强加的各种解释之一一致。这些指涉物可以同时存在,没有内在的矛盾。但是,要达成这样的共识,可能需要开发基于表述的新模型,而不是基于两个或更多代码的识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信