Estrogen receptor assay: Interlaboratory and intralaboratory variations in the measurement of receptors using dextran-coated charcoal technique: A study sponsored by E.C.O.G.

Shanthi Raam , Rebecca Gelman , Joseph L. Cohen
{"title":"Estrogen receptor assay: Interlaboratory and intralaboratory variations in the measurement of receptors using dextran-coated charcoal technique: A study sponsored by E.C.O.G.","authors":"Shanthi Raam ,&nbsp;Rebecca Gelman ,&nbsp;Joseph L. Cohen","doi":"10.1016/0014-2964(81)90267-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Six laboratories performing estrogen receptor analysis in breast cancer for patients included in clinical protocols of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group participated in a quality control study for estrogen receptor assay. Three tissue powders containing <em>10–50 femtomoles</em> of estrogen receptors/<em>mg</em> cytosol protein were distributed and the results analyzed for interlaboratory and intralaboratory variations. Frequency of misclassification of the receptor-positive powders as receptor-negative was related to the quantity of receptors. All labs except one were able to distinguish “low content” from “medium content” and the “medium” from the “high content” powders despite the variability in the numerical values reported for the powders. Two of the six labs reported consistently low values for all samples and the results of one lab were consistently higher than the average of the values obtained for the powders. These results could not be explained by the variations in protein content reported by these laboratories for different powders. Implications of the degree of inter-lab and intra-lab variations in the assay results are discussed with reference to their effect on selecting patients for hormonal vs chemotherapy. Based on the results of this study, tentative suggestions for quality control for the receptor assay are also made.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100497,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer (1965)","volume":"17 6","pages":"Pages 643-649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0014-2964(81)90267-X","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer (1965)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001429648190267X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

Six laboratories performing estrogen receptor analysis in breast cancer for patients included in clinical protocols of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group participated in a quality control study for estrogen receptor assay. Three tissue powders containing 10–50 femtomoles of estrogen receptors/mg cytosol protein were distributed and the results analyzed for interlaboratory and intralaboratory variations. Frequency of misclassification of the receptor-positive powders as receptor-negative was related to the quantity of receptors. All labs except one were able to distinguish “low content” from “medium content” and the “medium” from the “high content” powders despite the variability in the numerical values reported for the powders. Two of the six labs reported consistently low values for all samples and the results of one lab were consistently higher than the average of the values obtained for the powders. These results could not be explained by the variations in protein content reported by these laboratories for different powders. Implications of the degree of inter-lab and intra-lab variations in the assay results are discussed with reference to their effect on selecting patients for hormonal vs chemotherapy. Based on the results of this study, tentative suggestions for quality control for the receptor assay are also made.

雌激素受体测定:使用右旋糖酐包覆木炭技术测量受体的实验室间和实验室内变化:E.C.O.G.赞助的一项研究
在东方肿瘤合作小组的临床方案中,对乳腺癌患者进行雌激素受体分析的六个实验室参与了一项雌激素受体测定的质量控制研究。分布了三种含有10-50飞摩尔雌激素受体/mg细胞质蛋白的组织粉末,并分析了实验室间和实验室内的差异。受体阳性粉末误分类为受体阴性粉末的频率与受体数量有关。除了一个实验室外,所有实验室都能够区分“低含量”和“中含量”以及“中含量”和“高含量”粉末,尽管粉末报告的数值存在差异。六个实验室中的两个报告了所有样品的一致低值,一个实验室的结果始终高于粉末获得的平均值。这些结果不能用这些实验室报告的不同粉末的蛋白质含量的差异来解释。讨论了实验室间和实验室内测定结果变化程度的含义,并参考了它们对选择激素化疗患者的影响。在此基础上,对受体测定的质量控制提出了初步建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信