Beta-adrenoceptor blockade and vasodilatation in essential hypertension. Hemodynamic studies at rest and during exposure to stress.

R Eggertsen
{"title":"Beta-adrenoceptor blockade and vasodilatation in essential hypertension. Hemodynamic studies at rest and during exposure to stress.","authors":"R Eggertsen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute and long-term effects on blood pressure and hemodynamics both at rest and during acute exposure to loud noise of drugs with beta-adrenoceptor blocking and vasodilating properties. Prizidilol and carvedilol both act as nonselective beta-blocking and precapillary vasodilating compounds. Prizidilol (200 mg X 2) was compared to propranolol (80 mg X 2) plus hydralazine (25 mg X 2) and showed similar antihypertensive effect in a long-term double-blind randomized trial. Carvedilol was evaluated acutely with invasive (dye-dilution) and noninvasive (plethysmography) technique and showed an acute antihypertensive effect without causing a rise in TPR and with a decrease in regional resistance in the fore-arm. Acutely, carvedilol (25 mg and 50 mg) decreased blood pressure and regional resistance (50 mg) in contrast to propranolol (80 mg) which did not lower blood pressure acutely and caused an increase in regional resistance. In a long-term double-blind, randomized comparison, both propranolol (80 mg X 2) and carvedilol (25 mg X 2 and 50 mg X 2) showed a useful antihypertensive effect. After 29 days, however, it was still possible to demonstrate an acute decrease in resistance with carvedilol (50 mg) after tablet intake, indicating the vasodilating activity of this compound. When patients with essential hypertension were exposed to an even broad band noise (100 dBA), there was a rise in blood pressure due to an increase in TPR. Alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade (prazosin 2 mg) prevented the rise in TPR but blood pressure increased in spite of this due to a rise in CO. Moreover, nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blockade and alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade in combination (labetalol 200 mg) were unable to prevent the rise in blood pressure induced by noise. Finally, precapillary vasodilatation and beta-adrenoceptor blockade (prizidilol 400 mg) given as long-term treatment were also inefficient in preventing the noise-induced (105 dBA) rise in blood pressure. The absolute level of blood pressure obtained, however, was significantly lower than during placebo administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":75385,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"689 ","pages":"1-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Scandinavica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute and long-term effects on blood pressure and hemodynamics both at rest and during acute exposure to loud noise of drugs with beta-adrenoceptor blocking and vasodilating properties. Prizidilol and carvedilol both act as nonselective beta-blocking and precapillary vasodilating compounds. Prizidilol (200 mg X 2) was compared to propranolol (80 mg X 2) plus hydralazine (25 mg X 2) and showed similar antihypertensive effect in a long-term double-blind randomized trial. Carvedilol was evaluated acutely with invasive (dye-dilution) and noninvasive (plethysmography) technique and showed an acute antihypertensive effect without causing a rise in TPR and with a decrease in regional resistance in the fore-arm. Acutely, carvedilol (25 mg and 50 mg) decreased blood pressure and regional resistance (50 mg) in contrast to propranolol (80 mg) which did not lower blood pressure acutely and caused an increase in regional resistance. In a long-term double-blind, randomized comparison, both propranolol (80 mg X 2) and carvedilol (25 mg X 2 and 50 mg X 2) showed a useful antihypertensive effect. After 29 days, however, it was still possible to demonstrate an acute decrease in resistance with carvedilol (50 mg) after tablet intake, indicating the vasodilating activity of this compound. When patients with essential hypertension were exposed to an even broad band noise (100 dBA), there was a rise in blood pressure due to an increase in TPR. Alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade (prazosin 2 mg) prevented the rise in TPR but blood pressure increased in spite of this due to a rise in CO. Moreover, nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blockade and alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade in combination (labetalol 200 mg) were unable to prevent the rise in blood pressure induced by noise. Finally, precapillary vasodilatation and beta-adrenoceptor blockade (prizidilol 400 mg) given as long-term treatment were also inefficient in preventing the noise-induced (105 dBA) rise in blood pressure. The absolute level of blood pressure obtained, however, was significantly lower than during placebo administration.

原发性高血压的β -肾上腺素受体阻断与血管舒张。静息和应激时的血流动力学研究。
本研究的目的是评估具有β -肾上腺素能受体阻断和血管舒张特性的药物在静息和急性暴露于大噪音时对血压和血流动力学的急性和长期影响。普里地洛和卡维地洛均作为非选择性β阻断和毛细血管前舒张化合物。在一项长期双盲随机试验中,将普萘洛尔(200 mg x2)与心得安(80 mg x2)加肼嗪(25 mg x2)进行比较,结果显示相似的降压效果。卡维地洛通过有创(染色稀释)和无创(体积脉搏波)技术进行了急性评估,显示出急性降压效果,没有引起TPR升高和前臂局部阻力降低。与心得安(80毫克)相比,卡维地洛(25毫克和50毫克)急性降低血压和局部抵抗(50毫克),心得安没有急性降低血压并引起局部抵抗增加。在一项长期的双盲随机比较中,心得安(80mg x2)和卡维地洛(25mg x2和50mg x2)均显示出有效的降压效果。然而,在29天后,服用卡维地洛(50mg)片剂后,仍然有可能显示出耐药性的急性下降,这表明该化合物具有血管扩张活性。当原发性高血压患者暴露于均匀宽带噪声(100 dBA)时,由于TPR增加,血压升高。α - 1-肾上腺素受体阻断剂(吡唑嗪2毫克)阻止TPR升高,但血压升高,尽管这是由于CO升高。此外,非选择性β -肾上腺素受体阻断剂和α - 1-肾上腺素受体阻断剂联合使用(拉贝他洛尔200毫克)无法阻止噪音引起的血压升高。最后,作为长期治疗的毛细血管前舒张和β -肾上腺素能受体阻断(普利地洛400 mg)在预防噪声引起的(105 dBA)血压升高方面也无效。然而,获得的绝对血压水平明显低于安慰剂组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信