Differential effects of pentobarbital, ethyl alcohol, and chlorpromazine in modifying reticular facilitation of visually evoked responses in the cat

Yoshihisa Nakai , Howard F. Domino
{"title":"Differential effects of pentobarbital, ethyl alcohol, and chlorpromazine in modifying reticular facilitation of visually evoked responses in the cat","authors":"Yoshihisa Nakai ,&nbsp;Howard F. Domino","doi":"10.1016/0028-3908(69)90036-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cortical visually evoked responses (VER) elicited by electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral optic tract were dramatically facilitated by stimulation of the midbrain reticular formation. This facilitation depended on the experimental conditions used, such as the intensity and time course of reticular (RFs) and optic tract stimulation (OTs). Reticular facilitation of the VER was most intense at 8 times the EEG activating threshold with a 50 msec interval between the RFs and OTs. The effects of increasing accumulative doses of pentobarbital, ethyl alcohol, and chlorpromazine given i.v. on reticular facilitation of the VER were observed. In general. these agents did not alter the presynaptic component of the VER except for 32 mg/kg of pentobarbital which increased it. On the other hand, pentobarbital had a marked depressant effect on both the cortical postsynaptic components and relicular influences on them. However. pentobarbital did not depress reticular facilitation of the VER as much as the non-facilitated VER. This data would suggest that pentobarbital has a neocortical depressant effect which is somewhat greater than its effect on the midbrain reticular formation. Ethyl alcohol had a similar cortical depressant effect but produced no significant depression of reticular facilitation of the VER. In fact, RFs restored the VER almost to control. Chlorpromazine (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.) reduced slightly the cortical postsynaptic components of the VER but had no effect on its facilitation by RFs.</p><p>These results suggest that reticular facilitation of the VER is more resistant to depression by pentobarbital and ethyl alcohol than the VER alone. The postsynaptic components of the VER are quite sensitive to the effects of these drugs in contrast to its presynaptic component. In marked contrast to the actions of pentobarbital and ethyl alcohol, chlorpromazine showed much less of a postsynaptic neocortical depressant effect even when massive doses (up to 16 mg/kg) were used.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14111,"journal":{"name":"International journal of neuropharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1969-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0028-3908(69)90036-7","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0028390869900367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Cortical visually evoked responses (VER) elicited by electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral optic tract were dramatically facilitated by stimulation of the midbrain reticular formation. This facilitation depended on the experimental conditions used, such as the intensity and time course of reticular (RFs) and optic tract stimulation (OTs). Reticular facilitation of the VER was most intense at 8 times the EEG activating threshold with a 50 msec interval between the RFs and OTs. The effects of increasing accumulative doses of pentobarbital, ethyl alcohol, and chlorpromazine given i.v. on reticular facilitation of the VER were observed. In general. these agents did not alter the presynaptic component of the VER except for 32 mg/kg of pentobarbital which increased it. On the other hand, pentobarbital had a marked depressant effect on both the cortical postsynaptic components and relicular influences on them. However. pentobarbital did not depress reticular facilitation of the VER as much as the non-facilitated VER. This data would suggest that pentobarbital has a neocortical depressant effect which is somewhat greater than its effect on the midbrain reticular formation. Ethyl alcohol had a similar cortical depressant effect but produced no significant depression of reticular facilitation of the VER. In fact, RFs restored the VER almost to control. Chlorpromazine (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.) reduced slightly the cortical postsynaptic components of the VER but had no effect on its facilitation by RFs.

These results suggest that reticular facilitation of the VER is more resistant to depression by pentobarbital and ethyl alcohol than the VER alone. The postsynaptic components of the VER are quite sensitive to the effects of these drugs in contrast to its presynaptic component. In marked contrast to the actions of pentobarbital and ethyl alcohol, chlorpromazine showed much less of a postsynaptic neocortical depressant effect even when massive doses (up to 16 mg/kg) were used.

戊巴比妥、乙醇和氯丙嗪对猫视觉诱发反应网状促进的不同影响
同侧视神经束电刺激引起的皮质视觉诱发反应(VER)被中脑网状结构的刺激显著促进。这种促进作用取决于所使用的实验条件,如网状刺激(RFs)和视束刺激(OTs)的强度和时间过程。在脑电图激活阈值的8倍时,脑电图激活阈值间隔50 msec时,VER的网状促进作用最强。观察了戊巴比妥、乙醇和氯丙嗪静脉注射增加累积剂量对VER网状促进的影响。一般来说。除了32 mg/kg戊巴比妥增加突触前VER成分外,这些药物没有改变突触前VER成分。戊巴比妥对皮层突触后组分和神经递质均有明显的抑制作用。然而。戊巴比妥对VER的网状易化作用不如非易化VER。这一数据表明戊巴比妥对新皮层的抑制作用比其对中脑网状结构的影响更大。乙醇具有类似的皮质抑制作用,但对VER的网状促进性没有明显的抑制作用。事实上,RFs几乎恢复了VER的控制。氯丙嗪(0.5 mg/kg,静脉注射)能轻微降低脑皮层突触后成分,但对脑皮层突触后成分的促进作用无影响。这些结果表明,与单独使用VER相比,VER的网状促进作用更能抵抗戊巴比妥和乙醇的抑制作用。与突触前成分相比,突触后成分对这些药物的作用相当敏感。与戊巴比妥和乙醇的作用形成鲜明对比的是,氯丙嗪即使在使用大剂量(高达16 mg/kg)的情况下,其突触后新皮质抑制作用也要小得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信