Interactions between norepinephrine antagonists and potentiators (chlorpromazine, chlorpromazine sulfoxide and imipramine) and sympathetic amines (amphetamine and methoxamine) on the flexor reflex of the chronic spinal dog
{"title":"Interactions between norepinephrine antagonists and potentiators (chlorpromazine, chlorpromazine sulfoxide and imipramine) and sympathetic amines (amphetamine and methoxamine) on the flexor reflex of the chronic spinal dog","authors":"W.R. Martin, C.G. Eades","doi":"10.1016/0028-3908(68)90060-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The interactions of chlorpromazine (5 mg/kg), chlorpromazine sulfoxide (5 mg/kg) or imipramine (0·5 mg/kg), agents which have both adrenergic-blocking and adrenergic-potentiating properties, with amphetamine (2 mg/kg) or methoxamine (0·88 mg/kg), indirectly and directly acting sympathetic amines, were studied on the flexor reflex of the chronic spinal dog. Both methoxamine andd-amphetaminefacilitate the flexor reflex. Chlorpromazine completely antagonized the facilitatory effects of both methoxamine andd-amphetamine. Chlorpromazine sulfoxide and imipramine partially antagonized the facilitatory action of methoxamine; however, the antagonism was surmounted. Neither chlorpromazine sulfoxide nor imipramine antagonized the facilitatory effect of amphetamine; in fact, it was somewhat enhanced by chlorpromazine sulfoxide. It has been concluded that the central adrenergic-blocking property of chlorpromazine predominates, whereas, the adrenergic-blocking and adrenergic-potentiating effects of chlorpromazine sulfoxide and imipramine counterbalance each other.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14111,"journal":{"name":"International journal of neuropharmacology","volume":"7 6","pages":"Pages 493-501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1968-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0028-3908(68)90060-9","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0028390868900609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
The interactions of chlorpromazine (5 mg/kg), chlorpromazine sulfoxide (5 mg/kg) or imipramine (0·5 mg/kg), agents which have both adrenergic-blocking and adrenergic-potentiating properties, with amphetamine (2 mg/kg) or methoxamine (0·88 mg/kg), indirectly and directly acting sympathetic amines, were studied on the flexor reflex of the chronic spinal dog. Both methoxamine andd-amphetaminefacilitate the flexor reflex. Chlorpromazine completely antagonized the facilitatory effects of both methoxamine andd-amphetamine. Chlorpromazine sulfoxide and imipramine partially antagonized the facilitatory action of methoxamine; however, the antagonism was surmounted. Neither chlorpromazine sulfoxide nor imipramine antagonized the facilitatory effect of amphetamine; in fact, it was somewhat enhanced by chlorpromazine sulfoxide. It has been concluded that the central adrenergic-blocking property of chlorpromazine predominates, whereas, the adrenergic-blocking and adrenergic-potentiating effects of chlorpromazine sulfoxide and imipramine counterbalance each other.