CO2 storage in chalks: What are we afraid of?

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Tongtong Yu , Raoof Gholami , Arshad Raza , Kim Andre Nesse Vorland , Mohamed Mahmoud
{"title":"CO2 storage in chalks: What are we afraid of?","authors":"Tongtong Yu ,&nbsp;Raoof Gholami ,&nbsp;Arshad Raza ,&nbsp;Kim Andre Nesse Vorland ,&nbsp;Mohamed Mahmoud","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) has been recognized as an effective strategy to limit the temperature rise to 1.5 °C by 2050 under the Paris Agreement. As a result, more than 50 CCS pilot or large-scale projects have been commissioned in recent decades, targeting mainly sandstone reservoirs for their favourable petrophysical properties. Although many discussions and practical procedures have been developed, large-scale CO<sub>2</sub> storage in carbonates has not been implemented due to practical risks associated with rapid geochemical interactions. This study attempts to evaluate the feasibility of CO<sub>2</sub> storage in carbonate chalk formations by focusing on changes in storage capacity (porosity) and injectivity (permeability) over time. A series of laboratory tests were carried out on Stevns Klint chalk from Denmark after exposure to CO<sub>2</sub> for 37 days at a fluid pressure of 15 MPa and a temperature of 50 °C. The results obtained indicated a large removal of Ca<sup>+2</sup> ions from CO<sub>2</sub> saturated water solution and strong precipitation of secondary calcite in the pore structure, which reduced the porosity and permeability of the samples. It seems that CO<sub>2</sub> injection into chalk should be done very carefully, as the progressive dissolution of calcite and saturation of the formation water will initiate large secondary calcite precipitation in the long term, leading to a reduction in injectivity and storage capacity over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 103832"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583623000026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) has been recognized as an effective strategy to limit the temperature rise to 1.5 °C by 2050 under the Paris Agreement. As a result, more than 50 CCS pilot or large-scale projects have been commissioned in recent decades, targeting mainly sandstone reservoirs for their favourable petrophysical properties. Although many discussions and practical procedures have been developed, large-scale CO2 storage in carbonates has not been implemented due to practical risks associated with rapid geochemical interactions. This study attempts to evaluate the feasibility of CO2 storage in carbonate chalk formations by focusing on changes in storage capacity (porosity) and injectivity (permeability) over time. A series of laboratory tests were carried out on Stevns Klint chalk from Denmark after exposure to CO2 for 37 days at a fluid pressure of 15 MPa and a temperature of 50 °C. The results obtained indicated a large removal of Ca+2 ions from CO2 saturated water solution and strong precipitation of secondary calcite in the pore structure, which reduced the porosity and permeability of the samples. It seems that CO2 injection into chalk should be done very carefully, as the progressive dissolution of calcite and saturation of the formation water will initiate large secondary calcite precipitation in the long term, leading to a reduction in injectivity and storage capacity over time.

粉笔中的二氧化碳储存:我们害怕什么?
根据《巴黎协定》,碳捕集与封存(CCS)已被公认为到2050年将气温上升限制在1.5°C以内的有效策略。因此,近几十年来,已有50多个CCS试点或大型项目投入使用,主要针对具有良好岩石物理性质的砂岩储层。尽管已经开展了许多讨论和实际程序,但由于与快速地球化学相互作用相关的实际风险,碳酸盐中大规模的二氧化碳储存尚未实施。本研究试图通过关注储层容量(孔隙度)和注入能力(渗透率)随时间的变化来评估碳酸盐白垩地层中CO2储存的可行性。在15 MPa的流体压力和50°C的温度下,对来自丹麦的Stevns Klint白垩暴露于二氧化碳中37天,进行了一系列实验室测试。结果表明,CO2饱和水溶液中Ca+2离子的大量去除和孔隙结构中次生方解石的强烈沉淀,降低了样品的孔隙度和渗透率。因此,向白垩中注入二氧化碳应该非常小心,因为方解石的逐渐溶解和地层水的饱和将在长期内引发大量的次生方解石沉淀,导致注入能力和储存能力随着时间的推移而降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信