Clinical results of leukocyte interferon-induced tumor regression in resistant human metastatic cancer resistant to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy-pulse therapy schedule.

R Medenica, N Slack
{"title":"Clinical results of leukocyte interferon-induced tumor regression in resistant human metastatic cancer resistant to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy-pulse therapy schedule.","authors":"R Medenica,&nbsp;N Slack","doi":"10.1089/cdd.1985.2.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of Human 6 IFN (HLIFN) given in a pulse fashion was determined in a phase II study. Ninety-one cancer patients were evaluated (9 myeloma, 12 breast, 14 prostate, 9 melanoma, 4 renal, 6 astrocytoma, 7 ovarian, 9 large bowel, 7 gastric, 14 head and neck). They all had advanced progressive cancer that was resistant to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Patients were treated by intramuscular injection of 6 X 10(2) I.U./m2 for three consecutive days every four weeks. 84 patients were evaluable. Complete clinical response was obtained in 23 patients (4 myeloma, 2 breast, 5 prostate, 1 melanoma, 1 renal, 2 astrocytoma, 2 ovarian, 2 large bowel, 1 gastric, 3 head and neck). Partial responses were observed in 35 patients (3 myeloma, 7 breast, 6 prostate, 4 melanoma, 1 renal, 2 astrocytoma, 3 ovarian, 4 head and neck). Objective responses were related (P less than 0.01) to serum IFN level, with complete and partial responses (P less than 0.01) more commonly seen in those patients whose serum IFN levels at two hours were in the range of 1000 to 1650 I.U./ml. Side effects resulting from pulse IFN were acceptable for this group of patients and consisted of fever, transient chills, malaise and asthenia, and transient thrombocytopenia and leukocytopenia. The extent of fever was directly related (P less than 0.01) to response, and was most elevated in patients who achieved objective responses. IFN administered in a pulse fashion appears to be more effective than daily IFN and merits further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":77686,"journal":{"name":"Cancer drug delivery","volume":"2 1","pages":"53-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cdd.1985.2.53","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cdd.1985.2.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

The efficacy of Human 6 IFN (HLIFN) given in a pulse fashion was determined in a phase II study. Ninety-one cancer patients were evaluated (9 myeloma, 12 breast, 14 prostate, 9 melanoma, 4 renal, 6 astrocytoma, 7 ovarian, 9 large bowel, 7 gastric, 14 head and neck). They all had advanced progressive cancer that was resistant to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Patients were treated by intramuscular injection of 6 X 10(2) I.U./m2 for three consecutive days every four weeks. 84 patients were evaluable. Complete clinical response was obtained in 23 patients (4 myeloma, 2 breast, 5 prostate, 1 melanoma, 1 renal, 2 astrocytoma, 2 ovarian, 2 large bowel, 1 gastric, 3 head and neck). Partial responses were observed in 35 patients (3 myeloma, 7 breast, 6 prostate, 4 melanoma, 1 renal, 2 astrocytoma, 3 ovarian, 4 head and neck). Objective responses were related (P less than 0.01) to serum IFN level, with complete and partial responses (P less than 0.01) more commonly seen in those patients whose serum IFN levels at two hours were in the range of 1000 to 1650 I.U./ml. Side effects resulting from pulse IFN were acceptable for this group of patients and consisted of fever, transient chills, malaise and asthenia, and transient thrombocytopenia and leukocytopenia. The extent of fever was directly related (P less than 0.01) to response, and was most elevated in patients who achieved objective responses. IFN administered in a pulse fashion appears to be more effective than daily IFN and merits further evaluation.

白细胞干扰素诱导的对化疗和/或放疗-脉冲治疗方案有耐药性的人类转移性癌症肿瘤消退的临床结果。
在一项II期研究中,以脉冲方式给予Human 6 IFN (HLIFN)的疗效被确定。91例肿瘤患者(骨髓瘤9例,乳腺癌12例,前列腺癌14例,黑色素瘤9例,肾癌4例,星形细胞瘤6例,卵巢癌7例,大肠9例,胃7例,头颈部14例)。他们都患有对化疗和/或放疗有抗药性的晚期进展性癌症。患者采用6 × 10(2) iu /m2肌内注射,每4周连续3天治疗。84例患者可评估。23例患者获得完全临床缓解(骨髓瘤4例、乳腺2例、前列腺5例、黑色素瘤1例、肾脏1例、星形细胞瘤2例、卵巢2例、大肠2例、胃1例、头颈部3例)。35例患者(骨髓瘤3例,乳腺7例,前列腺6例,黑色素瘤4例,肾脏1例,星形细胞瘤2例,卵巢3例,头颈部4例)出现部分缓解。客观反应与血清IFN水平相关(P < 0.01), 2小时血清IFN水平在1000 ~ 1650 iu /ml范围内的患者更常出现完全和部分反应(P < 0.01)。对这组患者来说,脉冲干扰素引起的副作用是可以接受的,包括发烧、一过性寒战、不适和虚弱,以及一过性血小板减少和白细胞减少。发热程度与反应直接相关(P < 0.01),达到客观反应的患者发热程度最高。以脉冲方式给予干扰素似乎比每日干扰素更有效,值得进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信