{"title":"Oral ethanol reinforcement: interactive effects of amphetamine, pimozide and food-restriction.","authors":"A O Pfeffer, H H Samson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twelve male Long Evans rats, trained to lever press using 10% (v/v) oral ethanol reinforcement, were maintained with ad lib access to food and water in the home cage. After stabilization of responding, the rats were randomly divided into two groups: Group P received pimozide (PIM) injections (0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg) and Group A received d-amphetamine (DEX) injections (0.05 to 0.5 mg/kg). Following the sequence of either PIM or Dex injections, all rats were given four different combinations of PIM + DEX injections. The lower doses of amphetamine did not affect responding, but 0.5 mg/kg significantly reduced responding. All PIM doses except the lowest reduced responding. The combined PIM + DEX doses all reduced responding, in some cases further than either constituent dose alone. Next, all rats were reduced to 80% of their free feeding weights by food restriction, and tested with 0.25 mg/kg DEX, 0.1 mg/kg PIM, and 0.1 PIM + 0.25 DEX. As a result of food restriction, baseline responding increased significantly. The 0.25 mg/kg DEX dose tended to increase responding even above this baseline increase, while both PIM and PIM + DEX reduced responding.</p>","PeriodicalId":7671,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol and drug research","volume":"6 1","pages":"37-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol and drug research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Twelve male Long Evans rats, trained to lever press using 10% (v/v) oral ethanol reinforcement, were maintained with ad lib access to food and water in the home cage. After stabilization of responding, the rats were randomly divided into two groups: Group P received pimozide (PIM) injections (0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg) and Group A received d-amphetamine (DEX) injections (0.05 to 0.5 mg/kg). Following the sequence of either PIM or Dex injections, all rats were given four different combinations of PIM + DEX injections. The lower doses of amphetamine did not affect responding, but 0.5 mg/kg significantly reduced responding. All PIM doses except the lowest reduced responding. The combined PIM + DEX doses all reduced responding, in some cases further than either constituent dose alone. Next, all rats were reduced to 80% of their free feeding weights by food restriction, and tested with 0.25 mg/kg DEX, 0.1 mg/kg PIM, and 0.1 PIM + 0.25 DEX. As a result of food restriction, baseline responding increased significantly. The 0.25 mg/kg DEX dose tended to increase responding even above this baseline increase, while both PIM and PIM + DEX reduced responding.