Measurement assessment of the type A coronary prone behavior pattern and hyperactivity/problem behaviors in children: are they related? The Bogalusa Heart Study.
S M Hunter, F C Parker, G D Williamson, A M Downey, L S Webber, G S Berenson
{"title":"Measurement assessment of the type A coronary prone behavior pattern and hyperactivity/problem behaviors in children: are they related? The Bogalusa Heart Study.","authors":"S M Hunter, F C Parker, G D Williamson, A M Downey, L S Webber, G S Berenson","doi":"10.1080/0097840X.1985.9936756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to contribute to concept clarification regarding identification of the Type A behavior pattern in children. To accomplish this, two measurement techniques for assessing Type A behavior in children (MYTH and Hunter-Wolf) were compared to a third (a teacher-rated measure of hyperactivity: the Conners), since this latter measure, although often used to diagnose hyperactive children, seemed also to measure some Type A-like behaviors. The Hunter-Wolf also included a self-assessment of Type A behavior. The conceptual and measurement issue was: Are teachers rating Type A or hyperactive/problem behaviors in children? Fifty-five teachers participated. They rated 253 students, aged 8 to 17 years, in a biracial community. The clear overlap between teacher-assessed Type A and the Conners hyperactivity measure was demonstrated when the best predictor of teacher-assessed Type A measure was the Conners. This was especially true for black males and white females. Little relationship existed between teacher-assessed Type A and self-assessment. The conclusions suggest that implications drawn from teacher-assessed Type A behavior in children may be inadequate because of potential ethnic and gender artifactual measurement error.</p>","PeriodicalId":76006,"journal":{"name":"Journal of human stress","volume":"11 4","pages":"177-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0097840X.1985.9936756","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of human stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1985.9936756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to contribute to concept clarification regarding identification of the Type A behavior pattern in children. To accomplish this, two measurement techniques for assessing Type A behavior in children (MYTH and Hunter-Wolf) were compared to a third (a teacher-rated measure of hyperactivity: the Conners), since this latter measure, although often used to diagnose hyperactive children, seemed also to measure some Type A-like behaviors. The Hunter-Wolf also included a self-assessment of Type A behavior. The conceptual and measurement issue was: Are teachers rating Type A or hyperactive/problem behaviors in children? Fifty-five teachers participated. They rated 253 students, aged 8 to 17 years, in a biracial community. The clear overlap between teacher-assessed Type A and the Conners hyperactivity measure was demonstrated when the best predictor of teacher-assessed Type A measure was the Conners. This was especially true for black males and white females. Little relationship existed between teacher-assessed Type A and self-assessment. The conclusions suggest that implications drawn from teacher-assessed Type A behavior in children may be inadequate because of potential ethnic and gender artifactual measurement error.