[CEA and TPA in cancer of the breast. Findings and criteria of use].

Revista espanola de oncologia Pub Date : 1985-01-01
M Torres Avisbal, J M Ruíz de Almodovar Rivera, J Villalba Moreno, N Olea Serrano, O Padilla Bolivar, V Pedraza Muriel
{"title":"[CEA and TPA in cancer of the breast. Findings and criteria of use].","authors":"M Torres Avisbal,&nbsp;J M Ruíz de Almodovar Rivera,&nbsp;J Villalba Moreno,&nbsp;N Olea Serrano,&nbsp;O Padilla Bolivar,&nbsp;V Pedraza Muriel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In breast cancer, under rigorous and normalized conditions, the blood levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) allow us: to differentiate with enough precision, in treated patients, the presence of tumour (EP) from illness-free situation (NED); to alert about the appearance of metastases and/or local relapse in patients put under systematic postoperative evolutional control; to evaluate the systemic palliative treatment response in patients with metastatic breast cancer and to formulate, in this case, prognostic predictions. Blood levels of CEA and TPA are, otherwise, unsuitable: to detect with accuracy the primary tumour presence; to warn about the risk of subclinical tumour existence (in treated patients in NED situation); to predict, in this last case, the chemotherapeutic treatment response, and to prevent about local relapses development. The independent but combined use of both antigens, appreciably raises the diagnostic success percentage with regard to that obtained when only one tumour marker was used.</p>","PeriodicalId":77791,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de oncologia","volume":"32 2","pages":"265-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de oncologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In breast cancer, under rigorous and normalized conditions, the blood levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) allow us: to differentiate with enough precision, in treated patients, the presence of tumour (EP) from illness-free situation (NED); to alert about the appearance of metastases and/or local relapse in patients put under systematic postoperative evolutional control; to evaluate the systemic palliative treatment response in patients with metastatic breast cancer and to formulate, in this case, prognostic predictions. Blood levels of CEA and TPA are, otherwise, unsuitable: to detect with accuracy the primary tumour presence; to warn about the risk of subclinical tumour existence (in treated patients in NED situation); to predict, in this last case, the chemotherapeutic treatment response, and to prevent about local relapses development. The independent but combined use of both antigens, appreciably raises the diagnostic success percentage with regard to that obtained when only one tumour marker was used.

CEA和TPA在乳腺癌中的作用结果和使用标准]。
在乳腺癌中,在严格和标准化的条件下,血液中癌胚抗原(CEA)和组织多肽抗原(TPA)的水平使我们能够:在接受治疗的患者中,足够精确地区分肿瘤(EP)和无病(NED)的存在;警惕术后系统进化控制的患者出现转移和/或局部复发;评估转移性乳腺癌患者的全身姑息治疗反应,并在这种情况下制定预后预测。血液中CEA和TPA的水平,否则,不适合:准确检测原发肿瘤的存在;警告存在亚临床肿瘤的风险(在NED情况下接受治疗的患者);预测,在最后一种情况下,化疗治疗的反应,并防止局部复发的发展。两种抗原的独立但联合使用,相对于仅使用一种肿瘤标志物时获得的诊断成功率明显提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信