Ventricular arrhythmia-heart failure interaction and mortality in ICD recipients after myocardial infarction.

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mathieu Echivard, Jean-Marc Sellal, John J V McMurray, Chloé Ziliox, Luca Monzo, Zohra Lamiral, Kévin Duarte, Christian De Chillou, Guillaume Baudry, Nicolas Girerd
{"title":"Ventricular arrhythmia-heart failure interaction and mortality in ICD recipients after myocardial infarction.","authors":"Mathieu Echivard, Jean-Marc Sellal, John J V McMurray, Chloé Ziliox, Luca Monzo, Zohra Lamiral, Kévin Duarte, Christian De Chillou, Guillaume Baudry, Nicolas Girerd","doi":"10.1093/ejhf/xuag312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and heart failure (HF) frequently coexist in patients with ischaemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Whether VA and HF events are bidirectionally associated remains unclear. We investigated their bidirectional relationship and associations with mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed 1014 patients from the multicentre WICD-MI study. All received a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction (MI) and subsequently underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, with persistent LV ejection fraction ≤35%. Associations between ICD-treated VA, HF-events (HF hospitalization, heart transplantation, or LV assist device implantation), and all-cause mortality were assessed using time-dependent Cox models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years post-ICD implantation, VA was independently associated with an increased risk of HF events [aHR = 3.50 (1.66-7.38), P = .001], while HF events similarly preceded subsequent VA [aHR = 2.96 (1.59-5.50), P = .0008]. Both were independently associated with all-cause mortality, with a numerically higher aHR for HF events [aHR = 7.96 (4.71-13.47), P < .0001] than for VA [aHR = 4.43 (2.35-8.36), P < .0001]. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the VA-HF association was strongest for shock-treated arrhythmias. In exploratory analyses, VA was strongly associated with subsequent HF events in subcutaneous ICD recipients [aHR = 15.08 (4.62-49.22), P < .0001] but not in transvenous ICD recipients (P for interaction = .0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In ICD recipients with persistent LV dysfunction following MI, VA and HF events are bidirectionally associated and independently associated with mortality. The VA-HF association was strongest for shock-treated arrhythmias. These findings highlight the potential value of integrated HF and VA management.</p>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejhf/xuag312","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and heart failure (HF) frequently coexist in patients with ischaemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Whether VA and HF events are bidirectionally associated remains unclear. We investigated their bidirectional relationship and associations with mortality.

Methods: We analysed 1014 patients from the multicentre WICD-MI study. All received a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction (MI) and subsequently underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, with persistent LV ejection fraction ≤35%. Associations between ICD-treated VA, HF-events (HF hospitalization, heart transplantation, or LV assist device implantation), and all-cause mortality were assessed using time-dependent Cox models.

Results: Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years post-ICD implantation, VA was independently associated with an increased risk of HF events [aHR = 3.50 (1.66-7.38), P = .001], while HF events similarly preceded subsequent VA [aHR = 2.96 (1.59-5.50), P = .0008]. Both were independently associated with all-cause mortality, with a numerically higher aHR for HF events [aHR = 7.96 (4.71-13.47), P < .0001] than for VA [aHR = 4.43 (2.35-8.36), P < .0001]. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the VA-HF association was strongest for shock-treated arrhythmias. In exploratory analyses, VA was strongly associated with subsequent HF events in subcutaneous ICD recipients [aHR = 15.08 (4.62-49.22), P < .0001] but not in transvenous ICD recipients (P for interaction = .0002).

Conclusion: In ICD recipients with persistent LV dysfunction following MI, VA and HF events are bidirectionally associated and independently associated with mortality. The VA-HF association was strongest for shock-treated arrhythmias. These findings highlight the potential value of integrated HF and VA management.

心梗后ICD受者室性心律失常-心力衰竭相互作用及死亡率。
目的:室性心律失常(VA)和心力衰竭(HF)在缺血性左心室(LV)功能障碍患者中经常共存。房颤和心衰事件是否双向相关尚不清楚。我们调查了它们与死亡率的双向关系和关联。方法:我们分析了来自多中心wdd - mi研究的1014例患者。所有患者均在急性心肌梗死(MI)后接受可穿戴式心律转复除颤器,随后接受植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入,持续左室射血分数≤35%。使用时间依赖的Cox模型评估icd治疗的室性心律失常、HF事件(HF住院、心脏移植或左室辅助装置植入)和全因死亡率之间的关系。结果:在icd植入后2.6年的中位随访中,VA与HF事件风险增加独立相关[aHR = 3.50 (1.66-7.38), P = .001],而HF事件类似地发生在后续VA之前[aHR = 2.96 (1.59-5.50), P = .0008]。两者都与全因死亡率独立相关,HF事件的aHR数值高于VA事件[aHR = 7.96 (4.71-13.47), P < 0.0001] [aHR = 4.43 (2.35-8.36), P < 0.0001]。敏感性分析表明,VA-HF相关性在休克治疗的心律失常中最强。在探索性分析中,VA与皮下ICD受者随后的HF事件密切相关[aHR = 15.08 (4.62-49.22), P < 0.0001],但与经静脉ICD受者无关(相互作用P = 0.0002)。结论:在心肌梗死后持续性左室功能障碍的ICD受者中,VA和HF事件与死亡率是双向相关和独立相关的。VA-HF相关性在休克治疗的心律失常中最强。这些发现突出了心衰和室性心律失常综合治疗的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Heart Failure
European Journal of Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
365
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书